Canadian Police Want Blood Samples From Entire Town To Solve Murder

W

WhatInThe

SF VIP
Canadian police want blood samples from entire town to 'help solve a murder'.

http://www.infowars.com/unable-to-s...police-to-collect-door-to-door-blood-samples/

It's in Windsor, Ontario and the police are going door to door.

Um, their town and people but it's usually not guilty until proven guilty. NOT " guilty " until proven innocent. The ramifications of this are mind blowing including the reliance on random luck detective work and future use and storage of the samples taken. This sets a dangerous precedent not only in Canada but elsewhere because the one world government types will site this as example of law enforcement to be followed.
 

Interesting.

Windsor has a population of over a quarter-million people - who's going to fund the blood work-ups in the lab?

How long will it take? Even at an optimistic 1k people/day it would take almost a year of 7-day work weeks.

If you think about it, MANY arrests are performed on the assumption that the person is guilty. It's only at the trial where the truth MAY come out.
 
SifuPhil said:
Interesting.

Windsor has a population of over a quarter-million people - who's going to fund the blood work-ups in the lab?

How long will it take? Even at an optimistic 1k people/day it would take almost a year of 7-day work weeks.

If you think about it, MANY arrests are performed on the assumption that the person is guilty. It's only at the trial where the truth MAY come out.
Click to expand...

This might be a different one because they say it's a 500 person population. Also there is already a name for this practice-"blooding".
 

Hmmmm, blood samples now we have their genetic code, we know who has the dumb genes, we could call the program Ansc-------- help me out here. What is all this noise about building a universal database for healthcare?
 
SifuPhil said:
Interesting.

Windsor has a population of over a quarter-million people - who's going to fund the blood work-ups in the lab?

How long will it take? Even at an optimistic 1k people/day it would take almost a year of 7-day work weeks.

If you think about it, MANY arrests are performed on the assumption that the person is guilty. It's only at the trial where the truth MAY come out.
Click to expand...


They aren't going to do blood tests on everyone. According to the article, they 'asked' if people would be willing to take a blood test at a later date.

And reading through it, it didn't sound to me like they are saying everyone is guilty (until the real one is proven guilty???), but are doing like most detectives do in an investigation, which is ask everybody who might have the remotest link to the victim until they can see patterns of behaviour appearing or further clues. It also didn't suggest that anyone was going to be arrested (unless he or she rang all sorts of bells with red flags flying)
 
Sounds voluntary to me, if it was mandatory it would be a different story. Too invasive, I wouldn't give any samples of my blood to the police.
 
WhatInThe said:
This might be a different one because they say it's a 500 person population. Also there is already a name for this practice-"blooding".
Click to expand...

Ah, okay, thanks. I was going by metropolitan area stats. Still ...

"Blooding" - oh, that's lovely. :eek:

Debby said:
They aren't going to do blood tests on everyone. According to the article, they 'asked' if people would be willing to take a blood test at a later date.
Click to expand...

It just sounds like the beginning of an ansc ... anschl... oh, what is that word? :cool:

And if you aren't willing to take the test? Does your name get placed on the "Naughty" list? Will you require more of their attention at a later date?

I'm sorry, but I've learned never to volunteer, especially when it comes to police or government. It rarely turns out well.
 
SifuPhil said:
And if you aren't willing to take the test? Does your name get placed on the "Naughty" list? Will you require more of their attention at a later date?
Click to expand...

My thoughts exactly, you'd be on the list of guilty until proven innocent who refused to "cooperate". Wouldn't it be a kick in the teeth if your willing blood sample proved a false positive, and you were hauled away to jail to be sentence for murder...a murder you were in no way involved with? Stranger things have happened, no?
 
Debby said:
They aren't going to do blood tests on everyone. According to the article, they 'asked' if people would be willing to take a blood test at a later date.

And reading through it, it didn't sound to me like they are saying everyone is guilty (until the real one is proven guilty???), but are doing like most detectives do in an investigation, which is ask everybody who might have the remotest link to the victim until they can see patterns of behaviour appearing or further clues. It also didn't suggest that anyone was going to be arrested (unless he or she rang all sorts of bells with red flags flying)
Click to expand...

Just as the police could say they are looking for the blood/dna found at the crime scene to prove guilt the public could say or feel that the request is an un-necessary on their part to prove innocence. The police can't do better than a 500 person suspect list? What if the culprit/s are out of towners. The town's citizens just gave up very private information for nothing. The police are the ones looking for the guilty party so let them prove it, with a warrant and probable cause.
 
SeaBreeze said:
My thoughts exactly, you'd be on the list of guilty until proven innocent who refused to "cooperate". Wouldn't it be a kick in the teeth if your willing blood sample proved a false positive, and you were hauled away to jail to be sentence for murder...a murder you were in no way involved with? Stranger things have happened, no?
Click to expand...

The town's or any group's 'voluntary' participation is still in a sense a form of mob justice. In this case rather than stoning the perpetrator they are in effect shaming the non voluntary participants. In tv land cop shows and occasional story you hear the police asking for "voluntary" samples to 'rule you out as a suspect'-how nice. Peer pressure and the perception of being a "cooperative" town folk are important. Police and volunteers use the "good citizen" routine to rationalize their actions.

Storage and future use of the samples ARE a concern. They could be used in the future, put in a data base or used to frame some one else, especially blood. And since it was a warrantless search could it actually be used in a Canadian court anyway.
 
They need to get a vampire on the case, he would be an expert on blood and soon sniff out the guilty party.:eek:nthego:
 

You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top