Pfizer CEO says “Omicron Variant Could Mean Fourth Vaccine Dose Needed Sooner Than Expected.”
(
https://www.usnews.com/news/health-ne... )
Where is the scientific data to support that bold statement? Scientists who are actually doing the research still agree the two-dose primary series offers effective protection against severe disease and death. If we’ve learned anything about SARS-CoV-2 in the past 20 months, it’s that Covid-19 virus mutations are not very predictable, so it’s reasonably likely that by the time they come out with an Omicron-specific booster, we’ll see another variant.
Pfizer’s CEO consistently makes these bold statements with no or very little scientific data to back them up, and he’s allowed to do that. Why is
he not being criticized for spreading misinformation?
The word "could" is used differently in science. Scientists say "could" only when scientific data suggests the
possibility of some specific event. We keep hearing there is “not enough data to prove definitively” that Omicron could be milder or more severe. Well, the same principle applies to the prospect of a 4th vaccine.
Pfizer’s CEO is no different than any other desk-scientist, he learned about Omicron by reading about it. Because of his position and status, his words are very influential, and yet he chooses to make statements without adequate data.