Hi all, I know there are probably many opinions about this. I'd like to hear from you guys.
I have never had a colonoscopy. I detest surgical procedures and Doctors....but I do what's necessary. I've read about options for "The Test" (in fact AARP magazine has an article this month)
There is one option called Cologuard. The lab looks for both blood and cancer-related DNA in the stool. This sounds like a pretty effective way to test. Especially if we have no symptoms or history.
They say not to eat any red meat for 3 days prior to testing or there may be false positive results.
Would you do this test and be satisfied or would you rather get the Colonoscopy?
I have never had a colonoscopy. I detest surgical procedures and Doctors....but I do what's necessary. I've read about options for "The Test" (in fact AARP magazine has an article this month)
There is one option called Cologuard. The lab looks for both blood and cancer-related DNA in the stool. This sounds like a pretty effective way to test. Especially if we have no symptoms or history.
They say not to eat any red meat for 3 days prior to testing or there may be false positive results.
Would you do this test and be satisfied or would you rather get the Colonoscopy?