I suppose it depends on who is cast as Dracula. As far as I'm concerned, no matter how outwardly attractive he might be, knowing what he really is makes him completely devoid of any charm.
I seriously doubt anyone would find Nosferatu remotely attractive.
There was a time when vampires didn’t sparkle in daylight or give interviews to Christian Slater. They were the menacing undead who were best avoided – Count Dracula, in particular. In the case of F. W. Murnau's
Nosferatu (1922), the first vampire movie and a legendary piece of filmmaking, starring Max Schreck,, that was especially true.
The film cribbed the tale of Dracula, changing the names of the characters to avoid lawsuits. That plan failed, and Bram Stoker’s estate filed a lawsuit after Nosferatu’s release. As a result, all copies of the film were ordered destroyed. However, one copy survived. That sole print was reproduced again and again, moving down through the generations, and over the years, it’s become a cult classic. But is the classic vampire movie Nosferatu (1922) really any good? Look, it’s not Daybreakers, Buffy The Vampire Slayer, Van Helsing or Dracula Untold, but it’s still pretty decent.
The Nosferatu Story
. >
Nosferatu 1922, The First Vampire Movie Still Scares 100 Years Later