Feel Good Story: Heart-of-Gold Automobile Dealer

officerripley

Well-known Member
Location
Porlock, Calif
A 16-year-old kid who had paid $9,800 for a car had it re-possessed when it turned out that the guy he bought it from didn't actually own it and had stopped making the payments. A car dealership--NOT the one the car's seller worked for--stepped up and did a cool thing; to read the story: https://jalopnik.com/a-dealer-surpr...tter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=2022-01-04
 

I remember when a car company, from the Far East, first came to the UK,
about a month before they were advertising for people to apply to get
a free car, I have no idea if there were any, I never saw any reports from
anybody who got one, there were plenty who complained that they didn't
and no reply from the company, that I ever saw.

Mike.
 

I remember when a car company, from the Far East, first came to the UK,
about a month before they were advertising for people to apply to get
a free car, I have no idea if there were any, I never saw any reports from
anybody who got one, there were plenty who complained that they didn't
and no reply from the company, that I ever saw.

Mike.
Sounds like the old "bait and switch" tactic which I believe is illegal.
 
It's not out of the goodness of his heart. Jalopnik was running the story for a week about the repossession of that car from the kid and faced a huge amount of criticism from the car enthusiast community. The dealer did this to get the enthusiast community off his back.
 
It's not out of the goodness of his heart. Jalopnik was running the story for a week about the repossession of that car from the kid and faced a huge amount of criticism from the car enthusiast community. The dealer did this to get the enthusiast community off his back.
The dealer (Frank Kent Motor Co.) who gave the kid a car is different from the dealer (I-Drive-DFW) who re-possessed the car and for whom the sleazy salesman that defrauded the kid worked (and who knows, maybe even does still work there).
 
The dealer (Frank Kent Motor Co.) who gave the kid a car is different from the dealer (I-Drive-DFW) who re-possessed the car and for whom the sleazy salesman that defrauded the kid worked (and who knows, maybe even does still work there).
I think such business people should be held accountable. There is a connection between being ethical and our liberty and I have zero tolerance for businesses that are not ethical.
 
The dealer (Frank Kent Motor Co.) who gave the kid a car is different from the dealer (I-Drive-DFW) who re-possessed the car and for whom the sleazy salesman that defrauded the kid worked (and who knows, maybe even does still work there).
Well if that the case, it seems even more opportunist on the part of the third party. Sorry, I don't trust car dealers at all.
 


Back
Top