You only need an advisor if you have a lot of money. Too often, they are just whole life insurance salespeople which is another bad investment.
Agree with C50 - you DO NOT need to have a lot of money. As I pointed out, it is the middle-class who would most benefit from a good fiduciary CFP, but most CFPs do have a minimum for portfolio assets (NOT the same as net worth) because the $200K portfolio is just as time-consuming to manage as the $2M portfolio.
If you have been talking to "advisors" who are just 'whole life insurance salespeople', then I doubt they are truly professional fiduciary CFPs. And good ones in that class are even harder to find, unless you get a personal referral to one. The top independent CFPs do little or no "hard" advertising; they prefer to get their business from personal and professional referrals.
Saving and investing are VERY different than distributions and resultant tax issues. I enjoy the first two but have zero interest in managing the last two items. I did very well on our self-directed investing, but our CFP firm has done a level better than I could have on distributions and taxes, while continuing to grow our portfolio. In fact, net of fees, if we had not taken distributions the firm would have more than doubled our portfolio assets in less than 13 years. It's still larger than the original balance we transferred, by a sizable margin.
But yes, I do think MOST people, if they are willing to spend some time and effort, can learn the fundamental knowledge and do some of their own financial planning.
Just remember than
financial planning is not just your savings. It is also your family situation, your personal insurance needs (including old age), your estimated longevity, your goals, your risk tolerance, general inflation - and most importantly, your expectations vs reality of old age/disability.