For those who are so enamoured of their guns, here's a question: How often are guns used for a good purpose, as opposed to those used for a bad one? And before you jump in with, "Well, the police have guns for a good purpose," ask yourself, really? Lately, in this country?
As far as suicide goes, I have mixed feelings. I think there are situations where suicide is justifiable, and is probably a good option to have. The focus shouldn't be on the "tool" that is used to achieve this; it should be on whether it should always be prevented, in all circumstances. This is a hard one to answer. For a person who is temporarily depressed, grieving, in temporary physical pain, or being bullied, no, it should not be easy for them to end their own life. But what about people with horrible illnesses, where there is no hope of recovery? What about people so sunk in depression that there is really no hope of rising out of it? If some of those suicides are justifiable, why not just have pills available, after all other options have been exhausted, as in those countries with medically assisted suicide? Why should a gun be necessary?
But I do think that the original article by Top Washington that I quoted has a good point. He is glad that he didn't have an easy way to do it, which a gun would have provided. He is probably also glad he didn't have a cyanide pill. And he is still here, and hopefully has recovered some joy in life.