HermitHogan
Senior Member
- Location
- 3rd Stone from the Sun
The only time I watch CBS is if there's a game on that channel I want to see. They're the worst of the big three when it comes to credibility.
This raises the issue that their staff may ‘self censor’ to avoid being publicly humiliated, and in the case of the big names, losing a job paying extremely high wages.If you want another example, there's the attempt by Tony Doukoupil of CBS to conduct an interview with Ta-Nehesi Coates, which has turned into a major controversy. Coates managed to write an entire (short) book about the plight of the Palestinians in Gaza without mentioning October 7 or Hamas, and Doukoupil pushed him on it. As a result, he has been reprimanded and subjected to "study sessions" by management.
CBS' handling of contentious 'Mornings' segment with Ta-Nehisi Coates raises new questions
I tried reading both sides, but if both sides are just posturing and ignoring inconvenient facts, it's hard to get to the truth. I do find CNBC good for business news. And, the WSJ articles (not editorials and comments) are fairly objective.I make an effort to get out. I read books by both liberal and conservative authors, I read liberal and conservative op-eds, and watch PBS and NBC Nightly News, which I would describe as "mainstream liberal." I read the Wall Street Journal but also the New York Times, at least sometimes. The only really "balanced" reporting I see is on CNBC, which covers non-business news pretty objectively, at least in my view.
Television news has indeed intentionally edited videos of political speeches and public statements to change the context and meaning.Having your own opinion is fine.
Stating that a network changed replies is a strong statement that should be backed up with facts.
It is. I get 1440. It's mostly fluff. I prefer bare-bones news.This post was written in the summer of '23 and somehow got resurrected again yesterday.I don't even know if this place is still in operation.