ClassicRockr
Well-known Member
I think too many people have the mistaken impression that Social Security is sufficient to provide a sole means of support in one's retirement years. They either didn't or couldn't take responsibility for saving additional funds for their retirement.
It has been widely discussed for several years that Social Security is in trouble. I doubt that the program will ever be discontinued... but we will undoubtedly see major changes happening as more people retire and begin collecting benefits. I imagine there will be means-testing instituted at some point to scale down payout to more affluent retirees. I think that sucks because they are the ones who likely paid the most into the tax but could potentially see their benefits reduced.
Your are absolutely right, about not being able to save. If I would've continued with my college education, like my wife did, I would have made a better salary working in Purchasing and/or Inventory Control. I was able to work those two areas later in my life, but didn't get the salary I would've with a college degree. The highest salary I ever made was $14.50 per hr. and that was after I met my wife and we moved to Colorado. I was 52 years old then. It's almost embarrassing to me that that is all I made during my working career.
When I went to collect my Early Retirement SS at 62, I was told straight up "Social Security was never meant to live on." But, because I was having an extremely hard time finding a job in Purchasing and/or Inventory Management, after we moved from Colorado, when I turned 62, wife and I decided that I should apply for my SS. Actually, I don't know how many Seniors who are now 70 and are working a full-time descent paying job, PLUS getting full SS, but my wife is. Her SS sure makes our life easier.
We know two men that get a darn good Pension and also collect full SS. Some folks would say, "Sure must be nice".