Humanity’s ‘Biggest Lie’

David777

Well-known Member
Location
Silicon Valley
Following news article today is dead center to my own sustainable world attitude and voice.

Humanity’s ‘Biggest Lie’: The ‘Lightbulb Moment’ That Changed a NASA Astronaut Forever

Humanity’s ‘Biggest Lie’: The ‘Lightbulb Moment’ That Changed a NASA Astronaut Forever


From the breathtaking view of Earth’s fragile atmosphere to a startling realization about humanity’s priorities, a NASA astronaut’s ‘lightbulb moment’ in orbit revealed a truth that could reshape our future. What did he see from space that challenged everything we believe? And how does this “biggest lie” impact us all?

From space, the truth is undeniable: Earth is fragile, and humanity is living a monumental “lie.” Former NASA astronaut Ronald Garan, after spending 178 days in orbit, challenges the priorities that underpin our civilization. From his unique vantage point aboard the International Space Station (ISS), Garan witnessed Earth’s beauty and fragility, but also uncovered a harsh truth: humanity’s current systems are fundamentally unsustainable. However, his message is not just a critique—it’s also a call to action.

During his missions in 2008 and 2011, Garan marveled at Earth’s interconnected systems. Lightning storms illuminating the night, auroras shimmering across the poles, oceans reflecting sunlight—these sights revealed the delicate balance sustaining life. But this beauty carried a sobering reality. Garan described the atmosphere, Earth’s protective layer, as “thinner than the skin of an onion”—a fragile boundary shielding us from the void of space. From his perspective, the damage inflicted by human activity on this life-support system was alarmingly clear.

“From space, it becomes painfully evident that our human-made systems treat Earth’s vital systems as mere subsidiaries of the global economy.”

This stark observation led him to a profound conclusion: humanity has its priorities backward.

The “Lie” of a Profit-First System: Garan argues that the global economy is built on a dangerous falsehood: that economic growth is more important than environmental and societal health. This framework, he asserts, ignores the finite limits of Earth’s resources and ecosystems. “We’re living a lie. The economy shouldn’t govern our existence; it should serve the planet.”

To ensure the survival of our species, Garan proposes a radical restructuring of priorities: place the planet first, society second, and the economy last. This reversal, he says, is critical to achieving long-term sustainability. While Garan’s revelations highlight a global crisis, they also provide a roadmap for change. He emphasizes that it’s not too late to act. Here are some concrete steps to realign our systems with Earth’s needs:


  • Rethink economic policies
  • Governments must prioritize environmental protection over short-term profits. This includes investing in renewable energy, phasing out fossil fuels, and imposing stricter penalties on polluters.
  • Adopt circular economy practices
  • Shifting from a wasteful linear economy to a circular model—where resources are reused and waste is minimized—can significantly reduce humanity’s ecological footprint. Countries like the Netherlands are already leading in this transition.
  • Redefine success
  • Moving beyond GDP as the sole measure of progress is essential. Alternative metrics, such as the Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI), incorporate environmental health, social well-being, and economic equity.
  • Encourage individual action
  • Every person can contribute by reducing single-use plastics, adopting sustainable consumption habits, and supporting local environmental initiatives.

“There’s no such thing as ‘them.’ There’s only us.” This profound statement illustrates Garan’s belief that humanity must come together as a united force to tackle the common challenges of climate change and environmental degradation.

Shared Responsibility: Governments and Citizens Must Act: While global frameworks like the Paris Agreement and the European Green Deal are steps in the right direction, Garan argues they must go further. Governments, industries, and individuals must embrace a planet-first approach to ensure a livable future. On an individual level, small actions can make a big difference. From volunteering in community projects to educating others about sustainability, every effort matters. Garan’s vision is clear: change starts with all of us.

The Call from Space: Will We Listen? Ronald Garan’s message is not just a critique of humanity’s past mistakes—it’s a challenge to rethink our future. He invites us to step beyond divisions and embrace a new global ethic where the planet, society, and economy work in harmony.

The choice is ours: will we continue living the “lie,” or will we confront the truth and take the steps necessary to build a sustainable future?
 

I completely agree with Garan! So true about the concept of our world being a 'living web' of life and systems and being so delicately balanced! And the idea that 'growth' is the be all and end all of government and corporate ambitions is going to be the end of societies in my opinion. Promoted by personal greed.

I've watched a few videos about how the AMOC keeps Western Europe temperate and how the melting ice in the Arctic is contributing to it's slowing, which in turn is changing how warm water is moving up to the northern hemisphere and will potentially change the livability of Europe and the UK is one more example of that delicate balance.

And yesterday I was reading an article that said researchers are beginning to think that the gradual change to both EV's and bringing better regulations to control the emissions from ICE vehicles, is causing a drop in the number of clouds that are encircling the earth and thus contributing to warming because clouds reflect the sun/heat back out of the atmosphere. It also went on to remind the reader that the drop in emissions also means cleaner air that is healthier to breathe! The balance is that delicate, that changing one needed thing is screwing up the system in some completely unexpected ways!

I think survival in the next couple hundred years is going to depend on having figured out how to make the changes that Garan mentioned in your post. And that is why I'm not optimistic.
 
Last edited:
Grow up. YOU get one chance. There is no guarantee of anything but calamity in the future. It's a promise.
There is no delicate balance, its a total fight out for existence. Live, enjoy, involve yourself, take it in cause its ending soon most likely.
Mother Earths Nature is It Hates YOur Guts and is Going to Kill YOu.
 
Sounds like hogwash. A cry for some kind of global socialist paradise.

What lies beneath the surface here? Selective depopulation followed by some sort of neo-feudalism?

It's been tried before on a smaller scale, and the cases that appear to have thrived for a while lived atop an outside world of markets and resources for exploitation. Those that remain today are facing nasty realities as the wheels gradually fall off, suffering a kind of sociological "soil depletion" and "leggy hothouse growth."

I have no idea how that can be scaled to global proportions. Where are your external markets and vast resources to exploit going to come from then? Global NIMBYism just isn't possible.
 
I’m afraid that the only people that will be interested in redefining success are the people that aren’t successful under the current model.

I doubt that anything will change until change becomes profitable.

Ferengi Rules Of Acquisition :)

#9: "Opportunity plus instinct equals profit."
#34: "The best deal is the one that brings the most profit."
#89: "Ask not what your profits can do for you, but what you can do for your profits."
 
I’m afraid that the only people that will be interested in redefining success are the people that aren’t successful under the current model.

I doubt that anything will change until change becomes profitable.
I don't agree with anything except your last sentence. And that is exactly the problem, that greedy people demand profit at the expense of the planet that supports life. That's why in a time of rising, environmentally damaging emissions, coal companies still want to destroy mountains and poison rivers that have people living downstream. Or why oil companies in northern Alberta are filling up toxic tailings ponds that are seeping into the water table and poisoning rivers and then not telling the people who have wells downstream. People who care about others, who care about the future of our children and theirs after them, are the ones who have recognized that we have to redefine 'success'.

And by the way, change is currently profitable and will become more so as people realize we must change. In Alberta, our provincial government chased away 34,000 jobs of renewable industries and in construction by instituting a moratorium on renewable projects. That could have meant profit for companies that saw the benefits of a transition. Transitions mean change, mean research, mean new construction, mean new industries and fabrications.....all of which mean profitable businesses.
 
I don't agree with anything except your last sentence. And that is exactly the problem, that greedy people demand profit at the expense of the planet that supports life. That's why in a time of rising, environmentally damaging emissions, coal companies still want to destroy mountains and poison rivers that have people living downstream. Or why oil companies in northern Alberta are filling up toxic tailings ponds that are seeping into the water table and poisoning rivers and then not telling the people who have wells downstream. People who care about others, who care about the future of our children and theirs after them, are the ones who have recognized that we have to redefine 'success'.

And by the way, change is currently profitable and will become more so as people realize we must change. In Alberta, our provincial government chased away 34,000 jobs of renewable industries and in construction by instituting a moratorium on renewable projects. That could have meant profit for companies that saw the benefits of a transition. Transitions mean change, mean research, mean new construction, mean new industries and fabrications.....all of which mean profitable businesses.
It’s fine that you don’t agree with me but I still have my doubts about redefining success.

As an example, Taylor Swift just finished the Eras tour that generated an estimated 2.6 billion dollars in two years.

Another example is Microsoft entering into a 20 year agreement with Constellation Energy to revive the Three Mile Island nuclear power plant so they will have a privately controlled source of energy to fuel their growth.

I’m not opposed to redefining success, I just don’t see much if any movement away from the current model.
 
Last edited:
Following news article today is dead center to my own sustainable world attitude and voice.

Humanity’s ‘Biggest Lie’: The ‘Lightbulb Moment’ That Changed a NASA Astronaut Forever

Humanity’s ‘Biggest Lie’: The ‘Lightbulb Moment’ That Changed a NASA Astronaut Forever


From the breathtaking view of Earth’s fragile atmosphere to a startling realization about humanity’s priorities, a NASA astronaut’s ‘lightbulb moment’ in orbit revealed a truth that could reshape our future. What did he see from space that challenged everything we believe? And how does this “biggest lie” impact us all?

From space, the truth is undeniable: Earth is fragile, and humanity is living a monumental “lie.” Former NASA astronaut Ronald Garan, after spending 178 days in orbit, challenges the priorities that underpin our civilization. From his unique vantage point aboard the International Space Station (ISS), Garan witnessed Earth’s beauty and fragility, but also uncovered a harsh truth: humanity’s current systems are fundamentally unsustainable. However, his message is not just a critique—it’s also a call to action.

During his missions in 2008 and 2011, Garan marveled at Earth’s interconnected systems. Lightning storms illuminating the night, auroras shimmering across the poles, oceans reflecting sunlight—these sights revealed the delicate balance sustaining life. But this beauty carried a sobering reality. Garan described the atmosphere, Earth’s protective layer, as “thinner than the skin of an onion”—a fragile boundary shielding us from the void of space. From his perspective, the damage inflicted by human activity on this life-support system was alarmingly clear.

“From space, it becomes painfully evident that our human-made systems treat Earth’s vital systems as mere subsidiaries of the global economy.”

This stark observation led him to a profound conclusion: humanity has its priorities backward.

The “Lie” of a Profit-First System: Garan argues that the global economy is built on a dangerous falsehood: that economic growth is more important than environmental and societal health. This framework, he asserts, ignores the finite limits of Earth’s resources and ecosystems. “We’re living a lie. The economy shouldn’t govern our existence; it should serve the planet.”

To ensure the survival of our species, Garan proposes a radical restructuring of priorities: place the planet first, society second, and the economy last. This reversal, he says, is critical to achieving long-term sustainability. While Garan’s revelations highlight a global crisis, they also provide a roadmap for change. He emphasizes that it’s not too late to act. Here are some concrete steps to realign our systems with Earth’s needs:


  • Rethink economic policies
  • Governments must prioritize environmental protection over short-term profits. This includes investing in renewable energy, phasing out fossil fuels, and imposing stricter penalties on polluters.
  • Adopt circular economy practices
  • Shifting from a wasteful linear economy to a circular model—where resources are reused and waste is minimized—can significantly reduce humanity’s ecological footprint. Countries like the Netherlands are already leading in this transition.
  • Redefine success
  • Moving beyond GDP as the sole measure of progress is essential. Alternative metrics, such as the Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI), incorporate environmental health, social well-being, and economic equity.
  • Encourage individual action
  • Every person can contribute by reducing single-use plastics, adopting sustainable consumption habits, and supporting local environmental initiatives.

“There’s no such thing as ‘them.’ There’s only us.” This profound statement illustrates Garan’s belief that humanity must come together as a united force to tackle the common challenges of climate change and environmental degradation.

Shared Responsibility: Governments and Citizens Must Act: While global frameworks like the Paris Agreement and the European Green Deal are steps in the right direction, Garan argues they must go further. Governments, industries, and individuals must embrace a planet-first approach to ensure a livable future. On an individual level, small actions can make a big difference. From volunteering in community projects to educating others about sustainability, every effort matters. Garan’s vision is clear: change starts with all of us.

The Call from Space: Will We Listen? Ronald Garan’s message is not just a critique of humanity’s past mistakes—it’s a challenge to rethink our future. He invites us to step beyond divisions and embrace a new global ethic where the planet, society, and economy work in harmony.

The choice is ours: will we continue living the “lie,” or will we confront the truth and take the steps necessary to build a sustainable future?
His 178-day stretch in orbit happened in 2011. Garan's insight is accurate, in my opinion. He was born in 1961. Your post makes me reflect on the lives and work of others who had arrived at the same realization well before him.

As an example, in 1966 Stewart Brand arrived at the same insight and launched his personal campaign to have NASA publicly release a satellite photo of the Earth from space. He arrived at his realization by a quite different route, and dedicated his life to doing what he could in light of this realization. Brand was born 23 years before Garan.
 
Last edited:
To ensure the survival of our species, Garan proposes a radical restructuring of priorities: place the planet first, society second, and the economy last. ...
  • ...
  • ...
  • Moving beyond GDP as the sole measure of progress is essential. Alternative metrics, such as the Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI), incorporate environmental health, social well-being, and economic equity.

This is very interesting. Though I believe saying 'the economy last' is wrong, the GPI includes a good economy as a plus, as do probably all of us individually! You can't manage what you can't measure, and the GPI looks like a really cool way to measure the costs as well as the benefits. I think we all do a GPI calculation for ourselves personally (examples: can afford a bigger house farther out of town, but then the commute is longer; job A pays less but has a good life balance and job B pays more but has a lot of stress and overtime).

I've looked up the state I moved away from and the state I moved to after retirement, and I'm not surprised to find that my new state scores much better on GPI (though I was surprised that the states measures it, I guess that is why it is better here).

According to the study, the top state GPI performers are: 1. Alaska, 2. Massachusetts, 3. Connecticut, 4. Hawaii, 5. Washington State, 6. New York, 7. Maryland, 8. New Hampshire 9. Rhode Island, 10. New Jersey. Vermont comes in at 11, and California is 14. The worst performing GPI states are: Texas, Oklahoma, Kentucky, Arizona, Mississippi, Alabama, West Virginia, North Dakota, Louisiana, Wyoming.
Interestingly, many states that rank highly under a GDP per capita metric, fall to the bottom of the GPI rankings, including Iowa, Nebraska, North Dakota, Texas and Wyoming. This is due, for example, to depletion and pollution costs in economies that depend largely on fossil fuel extraction.
 
It’s fine that you don’t agree with me but I still have my doubts about redefining success.

As an example, Taylor Swift just finished the Eras tour that generated an estimated 2.6 billion dollars in two years.

Another example is Microsoft entering into a 20 year agreement with Constellation Energy to revive the Three Mile Island nuclear power plant so they will have a privately controlled source of energy to fuel their growth.

I’m not opposed to redefining success, I just don’t see much if any movement away from the current model.
You're right, we aren't seeing any movement away from the current model and that is exactly the problem and why we're talking about it at all. Right now, money is the score keeping method of success. He who has the most money wins and completely ignores that A. they'll never be able to spend all the money they have and B. if they/we destroy our world in the process, they'll find little left to enjoy (or at least their future children).

My biggest disagreement with your original comment was your suggestion that those of us who don't have $billions to point to on our score card, are only suggesting the redefinition because we're jealous because we weren't successful according to that method of score keeping. I'm not in the least jealous because I know that I never had the drive to work as hard as they have, nor have I had the business acumen or desire to learn that kind of skill.....but have pursued the life I've pursued to get to where I am happy.

I'm suggesting that we need to redefine success so that we're looking at the good we do for our world as a whole, so that my grandson's kids could have the opportunity to see the clean rivers, our coastal cities, the wild life living on the land as they should.....and all that is threatened by the greed of humanity.
 
Don't the Ferengi have a rule of acquisition about investing in a looser a 2nd time around.
 


Back
Top