grahamg
Old codger
- Location
- South of Manchester, UK
Many on this forum will already know my views on the principle underpinning our family law systems, so I won't repeat them here, (look em up if you feel you need to).
The operative word in the thread title is "ONLY", the one I helpfully highlighted in capitals for you!
Without that small word I might argue any half decent parent wants what's in the child's best interests, in most circumstances anyway, (partisans in Yugoslavia during WWII reportedly strangling their own babies because their crying might give away their own position to the Nazi soldiers being an extreme example of parents not acting in a child's best interests, or at least, " above everything else").
However my focus here is on those parents proudly and reatedly putting forward a statement that makes them look like better people, certainly a better person/parent than the other one they're arguing with over the child, (hence "virtue signalling"!).
Those in authority say they too "only want what's in the best interests of the child", (the law forcing them to assert this in most western countries I believe), but so much is out of the hands of any authority as they can't force parents to love their children. They can only destroy the efforts of some doing so, as they busily try to deal with difficult situations in broken families one after another, and come up with a compromise of some kind.
The child being told the statement in the thread title by one or both parents, will learn eventually that they have been lied to, or at least told a half truth, because if argue "NO PARENT" ever goes through their lives without having dome selfish thoughts, no matter that they probably do all they can to put their children first and be genuinely good, and honest parents.
Unless you think you're a saint you can't pretend, if you use the thread title assertion, that you never consider your own interests sometimes over anyone else's.
The operative word in the thread title is "ONLY", the one I helpfully highlighted in capitals for you!
Without that small word I might argue any half decent parent wants what's in the child's best interests, in most circumstances anyway, (partisans in Yugoslavia during WWII reportedly strangling their own babies because their crying might give away their own position to the Nazi soldiers being an extreme example of parents not acting in a child's best interests, or at least, " above everything else").
However my focus here is on those parents proudly and reatedly putting forward a statement that makes them look like better people, certainly a better person/parent than the other one they're arguing with over the child, (hence "virtue signalling"!).
Those in authority say they too "only want what's in the best interests of the child", (the law forcing them to assert this in most western countries I believe), but so much is out of the hands of any authority as they can't force parents to love their children. They can only destroy the efforts of some doing so, as they busily try to deal with difficult situations in broken families one after another, and come up with a compromise of some kind.
The child being told the statement in the thread title by one or both parents, will learn eventually that they have been lied to, or at least told a half truth, because if argue "NO PARENT" ever goes through their lives without having dome selfish thoughts, no matter that they probably do all they can to put their children first and be genuinely good, and honest parents.
Unless you think you're a saint you can't pretend, if you use the thread title assertion, that you never consider your own interests sometimes over anyone else's.