I appreciate everyone's input. One thing that I should have mentioned because I may have mislead all of you and that is when I received the inheritance from my parents, there was a string attached. The money is in a non-revocable trust, however, one of the rules of the trust is that whatever money is left "must" go to my principle heirs. Money spent from the trust must be approved by my principle heirs, if the amount exceeds a certain number, which it may in this case. We would be selling the property that we own now, so depending on how much we would get for that sale; would depend on how much more we would need to spend from the trust. We don't really need to take the money from the trust, but we have never spent one cent of it thus far and we thought that this may be a good time to do so.
What will probably happen is that we will buy the property using the estimated amount that we should get from the sale of the original property and then use only a portion of the trust to stay under that magical number and use money from our own accounts to fund the remaining balance. That way, no one gets hurt and everyone stays happy.
I don't know why my parents set up the trust like they did. Each month, my wife and I, along with the other heirs, receive a statement of the value of the trust. Right now, the kids have very little interest in it, but my daughter just turned 45 and when she turns '50', she can start taking out little pieces of the trust, until age 65 and then she will be entitled to become a fully invested tenant of the trust. If my wife and I pass before the kids turn 65, then they are the rightful owners of the trust and have to abide by the same rules as we did with their heirs. To me, at least, it sounds really screwy.
What will probably happen is that we will buy the property using the estimated amount that we should get from the sale of the original property and then use only a portion of the trust to stay under that magical number and use money from our own accounts to fund the remaining balance. That way, no one gets hurt and everyone stays happy.
I don't know why my parents set up the trust like they did. Each month, my wife and I, along with the other heirs, receive a statement of the value of the trust. Right now, the kids have very little interest in it, but my daughter just turned 45 and when she turns '50', she can start taking out little pieces of the trust, until age 65 and then she will be entitled to become a fully invested tenant of the trust. If my wife and I pass before the kids turn 65, then they are the rightful owners of the trust and have to abide by the same rules as we did with their heirs. To me, at least, it sounds really screwy.