Vanity admission. There's a large mole on the right side of my face, as a young man I asked my doctor about having it removed. He advised me to leave it well alone. It was suspected that removal could trigger cancerous cells, he then asked why didn't I grow a beard? Simply because I hadn't thought of it doctor.
Fast forward thirty years and the beard, despite wearing it short and well trimmed, was starting to show just too many flecks of grey. What? Grey? Old people go grey, I'm not old. The beard came off, I preferred the mole than grey. What am I like?
Your doctor was wrong or misinformed.
I’ve had a few moles removed from my face, just for vanity. If they are the potentially pre-cancerous type (flat and not perfectly round) removal will be covered by most insurance. If they are not pre-cancerous, then you have to pay for removal yourself.
One I had removed just because it was near the inner-side of an eyebrow and every time I had to buy new glasses, I found myself choosing the frames depending on if the bridge of the glasses were going to fall above or below that mole! That's stupid! A mole should not be telling me what glasses to buy, IMO.
Ironically, that was long ago when there were not as many highly advertised deals on glasses and frames, so I’d spend maybe $300 on two pairs of glasses, the frames of which I would choose to workaround the mole.
For about $400 to $500 I could just get the mole removed and then have fewer restrictions on glass frames.
Anyway, if a mole is bothering you anywhere on your body, get that thing REMOVED, if you can afford to. I know many do not have $400 to spare. Doing so, for me, was a great decision. Scarring is minimal and after 6 months to a year, no one can see where the mole used to be unless you point it out to them.
Medicine has come a long way - get a mole removed if it bothers you. You’ll be mad that you didn’t do it sooner! And if it’s flat and the pre-cancerous type, it’s a legit health issue.