About thirty years ago a girls boyfriend abused her infant son while she was working. The child ultimately died from shaken child syndrome. The girl father (the child's grandfather) shot and killed the boyfriend. The video of the shooting was conclusive evidence against the grandfather. He was found not guilty, and the state appealed. In his second trial he was in fact found guilty and sentenced to 1 day in prison. The public was thrilled and I agree.
Pedophilia is a sickness and if you don't have that you may not judge about it
- Thread starter Messy
- Start date
Wouldn't get any argument from me on that. I'm all for it.
Has anyone here followed the Aaron Spencer case? Still ongoing. A man charged because of saving his daughter when taken by an older man.
You sure can.... 22 behind the ear.
Sunkist
Senior Member
I hadn't heard of that case, but have heard of similar.
The penalties/consequences should be on the scuzzballs who HARM kids/children, NOT on individuals who help/save the kids.
Sunkist
Senior Member
Even if the law says otherwise, there's something not-o.k. if a 35-year-old goes after a 16-year-old.
hollydolly
SF VIP
- Location
- London England
tell me about it.... My x husband had an affair with a 22 year old... he was 61... disgusting !!
Sunkist
Senior Member
Age differences can be too extreme..
Maybe the old goat was trying to relive his youth..
hollydolly
SF VIP
- Location
- London England
yes well whatever it was it destroyed our marriage....Age differences can be too extreme..
Maybe the old goat was trying to relive his youth..
He was charged. The trial is upcoming. Most people disagree with him being charged. While he was trying to stay behind him with his daughter, he was also on with 911 if I have my facts straight. Not like he was doing it unbeknownst and when he got the chance, and help had not arrived yet, he shot the man to save his daughter. The man had previously molested her, also if I have that right, I believe I do, and he came back after her again and took her and dad took off after him.I hadn't heard of that case, but have heard of similar.
The penalties/consequences should be on the scuzzballs who HARM kids/children, NOT on individuals who help/save the kids.
No one I know of disagrees with what he did, yet he was charged.
The only thing I think could affect things is he shot at him tons of times. But I think honestly that's even understandable. No jury imo is going to unanimously find him guilty.
I don't know what a DA is thinking charging him if they ever want to be elected again, if that is how it is done there.
And also? He just won the nomination for sheriff in that county probably BECAUSE of what he did.
If anyone gets a chance, look into it, google it. I didn't know about it at first but heard a lot of people referring to the case and then heard about what it was about.
gruntlabor
Well-known Member
- Location
- Last Frontier, Age 83
A 17-uear-old and a 16-year-old do not apply here, it's merely two children experimenting at what they should not be.
officerripley
Well-known Member
- Location
- Porlock, Calif
It doesn't seem like treatment of the pedophile would be an option in at least some of the cases since it's been found that half of all pedophiles were born that way. I guess they used to think that the only reason someone would be a pedo is if someone molested them when they were children at the same age they're most attracted to now. The brain waves of normal people and pedos made that way by getting molested when they were children are the same; the born pedos have weird, alien-looking brainwaves.