Pronoun genders?

Sunny

Sunny

SF VIP
Location
Maryland
Back in my youth, the only correct generic pronoun to use to show possession by one person was "his." Somewhere along the way, it became his/her. Now it appears to be "their," even when referring to only one person. "Every person is interested only in their own problems."

But it's going further than that now. I've seen sentences like "His daughter used to live in Boston, but they have moved out west." This is used even if the daughter is living alone, and only she has moved out west.

I think we are morphing into a language in which gender is irrelevant, and preferably not used at all.
 

Sunny said:
Back in my youth, the only correct generic pronoun to use to show possession by one person was "his." Somewhere along the way, it became his/her. Now it appears to be "their," even when referring to only one person. "Every person is interested only in their own problems."

But it's going further than that now. I've seen sentences like "His daughter used to live in Boston, but they have moved out west." This is used even if the daughter is living alone, and only she has moved out west.

I think we are morphing into a language in which gender is irrelevant, and preferably not used at all.
Click to expand...
Using "they" to refer to one person, especially after referring in the singular elsewhere in the sentence, just feels wrong to me. I understand that these days, the idea of only two genders, seems to be a thing of the past. We need a new word, or set of words, to refer to whatever genders have come into being/recognition. So far, that hasn't happened. I still use s/he or the traditional "she" and "he", but then that is one of the perks of being older. I don't have to "go with the flow" on the latest fads. :)

Tony
 
Follow the science:
Gender - the physical condition of being male OR female

everything else is a pipe dream. you either are 1 or the other except in a very few rare cases where people have both sets of organs.
 
tbeltrans said:
Using "they" to refer to one person, especially after referring in the singular elsewhere in the sentence, just feels wrong to me. I understand that these days, the idea of only two genders, seems to be a thing of the past. We need a new word, or set of words, to refer to whatever genders have come into being/recognition. So far, that hasn't happened. I still use s/he or the traditional "she" and "he", but then that is one of the perks of being older. I don't have to "go with the flow" on the latest fads. :)

Tony
Click to expand...
That's true. Instead of all the bitching and moaning, they should come up with new gender neutral pronouns for individuals. They only need two: one for he/she and one for her/his. Using a plural pronoun for an individual just sounds wrong.
 
Irwin said:
That's true. Instead of all the bitching and moaning, they should come up with new gender neutral pronouns for individuals. They only need two: one for he/she and one for her/his. Using a plural pronoun for an individual just sounds wrong.
Click to expand...
OneHalf nailed it. Apart from hermaphrodites we are either male or female. What's wrong with he, she, her or him?
 
horseless carriage said:
OneHalf nailed it. Apart from hermaphrodites we are either male or female. What's wrong with he, she, her or him?
Click to expand...
It isn't politically correct, and unfortunately, that seems to rule the day. This type of discussion has come up around here a time or two and I had been informed in such discussion that genders between male and female have been identified. I will continue to use "he" and "she" and just let others use "they" as they certainly will.

Tony
 
Irwin said:
That's true. Instead of all the bitching and moaning, they should come up with new gender neutral pronouns for individuals. They only need two: one for he/she and one for her/his. Using a plural pronoun for an individual just sounds wrong.
Click to expand...
In Swedish he is han and she is hon. We now also have a gender neutral pronoun hen.
 
Sunny said:
Back in my youth, the only correct generic pronoun to use to show possession by one person was "his." Somewhere along the way, it became his/her. Now it appears to be "their," even when referring to only one person. "Every person is interested only in their own problems."

But it's going further than that now. I've seen sentences like "His daughter used to live in Boston, but they have moved out west." This is used even if the daughter is living alone, and only she has moved out west.

I think we are morphing into a language in which gender is irrelevant, and preferably not used at all.
Click to expand...

When they call oceanic storms HER icanes, they nailed it, "Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned," HA.
 
Well, I guess "it" is a gender-neutral pronoun, but I doubt that too many people would want to be referred to that way either.
 
Languages change, and this might be the beginning of a change in ours, but maybe not.

A few years back I was working for a large engineering company, and some politically correct person decided to change the term "manhole" to "humanhole" in their CAD systems. So for a few days a lot of drawings with the embarrassing term "humanhole" appeared. It got fixed back to manhole pretty quickly. Now I wonder what they call them now... All seems a bit silly to me, y'all!
 
I used to work at the National Science Foundation. I worked in Engineering. One of our programs was called Strategic Manufacturing, but we called it "StratMan" internally. There was a complaint that this was sexist so we had to stop. Same thing with Technical Manufacturing that we called "TechMan".
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top