I hope all aboard the the sub are found & rescued. I also hope the rescuers are also kept from harm.
IMO, the Titanic is a grave-site & should be honored as such. To me is seems in bad taste to make money off of the misfortune of others. I'm glad it was finally located & questions about what happened could be answered. But in the end, it needs to be treated with respect.
The families of the sailors of the Edmund Fitzgerald, after photos were taken of the wreckage & a body then published in a book, wanted the ship to be preserved as a grave site. They didn't want anyone else to be able to profit off of their loss from this tragedy. The Canadian government amended their Heritage Act in 2006 that by permit only, allows for legitimate archeological, scientific or law enforcement purposes. The closest you can get without a permit is a 500-meter perimeter of the wreckage.
In 1986, the U.S. passed the Titanic Memorial Act that was meant to regulate exploration & salvage activities. It authorized negotiations for international guidelines with the U.K., Canada, France & anyone else who would agree. From what I found, it didn't go into effect until April 12, 2001 (see
https://www.gc.noaa.gov/documents/recoveryguidelines.pdf ). This PDF included the number of letters received from those who were opposed to some or all proposed regulations.
I'm not into government regulations, but when it comes to lives lost & their final resting place which should be a memorial to the dead, it seem to be the right thing to do. I don't believe making money on tragedies, no matter how long ago they happen.
Didn't mean to take this thread in a different direction
@hollydolly.
References:
https://detroithistorical.org/learn/encyclopedia-of-detroit/ss-edmund-fitzgerald
https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/titanic-edmund-fitzgerald-1.6882861
https://www.noaa.gov/gc-international-section/rms-titanic-international-agreement