Royal Sex Scandal-Under Age Girls and Prince Andrew

W

WhatInThe

SF VIP
Royal sex scandal involving under age girls including one said forced to be a sex slave.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/prince-andrew-been-secretly-filmed-4915421

Saw stories pointing to "shocking" sex scandal in British government for a couple of years now I'm wondering if this is it.

This really caught my because a just viewed a documentary on how the Duke Of Windsor wanted a peace treaty with Germany in World War II which is why Rudolph Hess flew to the big Island. Absolutely puzzling how much power the crowned family still holds in this day and age.
 

Sex scandals in the British government are nothing new.

As for the Royal Family, I'm pretty sure their needs are catered to with some discretion by aides acting as intermediaries.
However, Prince Andrew had entered the murky world of business, so who knows?
 
Well, of course, over here having sex with a 17 year old is not particularly murky.

If, as reported, she was unwilling that's a different matter, in any civilized country.
 

Dame Warrigal said:
Sex scandals in the British government are nothing new.

As for the Royal Family, I'm pretty sure their needs are catered to with some discretion by aides acting as intermediaries.
However, Prince Andrew had entered the murky world of business, so who knows?
Click to expand...

The on going one now is much more serious than any others you may have heard of.....but then again from what I have read the Australian government isn't without it's scandals.
 
The Australian government isn't without it's scandals
Click to expand...
You're not wrong there Bee.
Very salacious some of them are.

What I didn't really make clear in my post is that the Royal family is separate from government and also that the potential for scandal is very carefully managed. In the case of Prince Andrew the dangers of associating with the shady man at the core of this allegation seem not to have been foreseen. Either he was let down by his palace advisors or he ignored them.

I make no comment as to whether the allegations have any substance to them but the palace denial has been very vehement.
 
Now they are picking on Prince Andrew!

A claim is being made that he had sex with female minors in the past. Surely you agree with me that this is outrageous and just another attempt to embarass the royal family...
 
Oops, sorry for a similar thread, but maybe as a royalist I couldn't help it... :eek:nthego:
 
Ralphy1 said:
People should leave their betters alone. Now, about that Polanski guy... :D
Click to expand...


'their betters'!!!!? Seriously, you are suggesting that j those people are 'better' than anyone else? Royalty got there because centuries ago, they were the 'worst a&&holes in the valley', not because they are inherently kinder, more compassionate, more generous, more gentle.....that collection (in their entirety!) might possibly have made them better than the general public, but they can't even brag about being all of those things.

They held onto their position by virtue of manipulations, scheming and having the biggest army (paid for by peasants that were forced to support them by the way or suffer the consequences) and they've become a tradition. But better than any of us? Please tell me you don't really believe that.
 
QuickSilver said:
Nothing surprises me... after Cosby
Click to expand...


Nothing surprised me before Cosby, people are very good at pretending to be virtuous, pious so very above board. Just like somebodies keeping those sex traffickers in business. It's what some do, not what they say you sometimes have to watch out for.

:oops:Maybe :tmi:. LOL
 
Debby said:
'their betters'!!!!? Seriously, you are suggesting that j those people are 'better' than anyone else? Royalty got there because centuries ago, they were the 'worst a&&holes in the valley', not because they are inherently kinder, more compassionate, more generous, more gentle.....that collection (in their entirety!) might possibly have made them better than the general public, but they can't even brag about being all of those things.

They held onto their position by virtue of manipulations, scheming and having the biggest army (paid for by peasants that were forced to support them by the way or suffer the consequences) and they've become a tradition. But better than any of us? Please tell me you don't really believe that.
Click to expand...


Oh! dear:blah: someones on their high horse.
 
Bee said:
Oh! dear:blah: someones on their high horse.
Click to expand...


Looking in the mirror are we?

So if you don't agree, tell me, how did 'royalty' get to be royalty. Did the 'clan' vote them in when it was small villages/towns dotted across the land? Or did they take their position by force? And can you pinpoint any aspect of their DNA that suggests they are a separate and inherently better person/species than the rest of us?
 
What mirror would that be Debby???

The mirror that tells me not to look back because there is damn all I can do about it.

The mirror that tells me to look to the present and to the future but never look back.

The mirror that tells me not to hold it against someone for what their ancestors did hundreds of years ago.

....or maybe the mirror that tells me not to speculate on someone because of their ancestors.
 
The more I read about this lawsuit the more proof there seems to be including photos, multiple witnesses and known pervert hosting some of these 'get togethers'. The Prince now 54 would've been in his 30s in the 90s so even if a older looking TEENAGER one has to wonder. Alot of this happend at a Palm Beach Mansion.

Sidenote no one seem to flinch when actor Paul Walker died and they gave his bio and the story about his teenage wife. The Prince went to the wrong coast. Who says celebrity doesn't come with get of jail free cards.
 
Bee said:
What mirror would that be Debby???
..........or maybe the mirror that tells me not to speculate on someone because of their ancestors.
Click to expand...




Hey Bee, I don't judge anyone on their ancestors but neither do I revere someone because of his 'job'. In my book, people earn respect.

The comment I was responding to seem to indicate that someones 'job' made them a better person than me, or you or Ina or even Ralph. I stated my disagreement with that premise and I also pointed out that those 'royals' didn't get their 'job' because of any inherent perfection or because they were nicer than the rest of us, they(their families) simply took what they wanted and too often at the expense of any and all who disagreed with them. Not a judgement so much as an observation of historical 'fact'.

So I'm not sure where your 'high-horse' comment came from which is which is why I wondered if you were in front of the mirror. Besides, my horse is and was out in the pasture at the time I made my comment.:)
 
Laurie said:
Well, of course, over here having sex with a 17 year old is not particularly murky.

If, as reported, she was unwilling that's a different matter, in any civilized country.
Click to expand...

In some states if you are not in your early 20s sex with someone 17 or younger can be a felony.

http://www.age-of-consent.info/states/Florida

I think that's the issue here because the this rich friend of the Prince had a mansion in Palm Beach County/USA/Florida. This all didn't happen out of country.
 

You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top