Scotland set to abolish Not Proven verdict.

[Capt Lightning]

Since the 17th. century, Scots law sic has had three possible verdicts at a trial - Guilty, Not guilty, and Not Proven. Although Not proven has the same effect as Not guilty, it basically suggests that rather than being innocent, there is insufficient proof of a guilty verdict. This third outcome is now set to be abolished and Scots law will fall in line with the rest of the UK.

 

[hollydolly]

About time...

 

[WhatInThe]

If there isn't enough proof why were they charged in the first place. This also taints future juries and/or judges.

I get the expression 'What you know and what you can proove are two different things' But this seems away to label someone with a scarlett letter. But it's is thankfully no more.

 

[Been There]

I will say this. Having the 3 different verdicts is very creative or maybe I should say inventive idea.

 

[Aunt Bea]

 

[hollydolly]

If there isn't enough proof why were they charged in the first place. This also taints future juries and/or judges.

I get the expression 'What you know and what you can proove are two different things' But this seems away to label someone with a scarlett letter. But it's is thankfully no more.

Precisely that... you have it in a nutshell....

 

[WOLF ANGEL]

Just read the article =

Not proven verdict to be scrapped as Scottish Parliament backs reforms

• = (Some worrying stats relating to 'Not Proven cases)

 

[oldman]

I would think there may be a story as to why the three verdicts were given as a choice.