I'm usually in a hurry when I'm buying things on our shopping list, and that's why I opt for self checkout. I know there is an argument that is a job killer, business will do what it takes to manage cost. Today I saw an article about a major retailer opting to limit or suspend self checkout in certain locations. I'm sure it is related to some level of cheating the system. I am willing to pay for my selections with or without manned checkout. If I fail to scan an item it truly a mistake on my part and not intentional.
I resent two things in this discussion. First of all it really irritates me that I may be asked to present my receipt to have it checked. I walked through the store and located every single item. I place it in a cart, then I scan each item, then I bag it, then I put it back in the cart to move to my car, and finally put it in the car. All of those steps used to be part of customer service. Second, if there is a reason to limit self checkout's convenience it will be imposed upon us by those who are going to try to cheat the system anyway. I venture to say that it is again a case of the honest penalized by the dishonest every time.
I resent two things in this discussion. First of all it really irritates me that I may be asked to present my receipt to have it checked. I walked through the store and located every single item. I place it in a cart, then I scan each item, then I bag it, then I put it back in the cart to move to my car, and finally put it in the car. All of those steps used to be part of customer service. Second, if there is a reason to limit self checkout's convenience it will be imposed upon us by those who are going to try to cheat the system anyway. I venture to say that it is again a case of the honest penalized by the dishonest every time.