Seven Important Foods for Seniors

I'm glad these foods are recommended, as I like to eat most of them regardless. Kiwi and Greek yogurt are too expensive for me, but unsweetened store brand yogurt is just fine, as a source of protein and probiotics. I eat a lot of blueberries, strawberries, apples etc on a regular basis, which have fiber and antioxidant properties.
Totally agree...I like Yoplait Light or the store brand, both are very good and I pay about $5 for 12 cups.
 

The OP may have been well-intentioned because such is useful information but... First he never posted any text beyond the thread title to support the video, that was not a good sign for this person. When I opened the Youtube video the length showed over 19 minutes. Way way too long just to find out what that might be general information many of us already have fairly good knowledge of. In any case curious, started running it that first had 2 commercials to MUTE before ending. The first statement was something about eating healthy before bedtime. Not good because healthy is NOT consuming food for a couple hours before bedtime to allow foods to adequately digest lest when sleeping, food is not as well moved through the GI tract. So yeah, aborted.

I'd bet they don't at the beginning list whatever food before going through each and suspect they first explain why healthy foods are good and then go through each selection one by one until a person has had to watch an injected Youtube commercial every minute or so that benefits their Youtube commercial ratings. Maybe I'm wrong on that, but no one thus far has even posted those 7 that says much about its worth to anyone that started to.

Your entire comment boils down to "I didn’t watch it, but I know it’s bad." If you're going to dismiss a video without engaging with its actual content, at least admit it’s about your attention span, not the quality of the info. Sure, not every video is perfectly structured or ad-free, but some people appreciate practical breakdowns over vague textbook advice. If no one’s posted the 7 foods yet, why not ask, or better yet, watch long enough to find out?
 
I did admit NOT watching it because it was "way way too long". And then challenged someone to prove what I suspected wasn't true. And someone DID ASK. Yes some may appreciate that format but you didn't help by not warning, just posting the video for your audience having to find out. So my advice if someone posts a reasonably short video, no explanation necessary. But not so without a warning for long videos, especially for what as I noted most of us probably already are knowledgeable about.
 
I did admit NOT watching it because it was "way way too long". And then challenged someone to prove what I suspected wasn't true. And someone DID ASK. Yes some may appreciate that format but you didn't help by not warning, just posting the video for your audience having to find out. So my advice if someone posts a reasonably short video, no explanation necessary. But not so without a warning for long videos, especially for what as I noted most of us probably already are knowledgeable about.
On forums populated by younger folk it is common to indicate TL;DR as part of a reply to a lengthy text read, or a barrage of linked/embedded videos.
 
On forums populated by younger folk it is common to indicate TL;DR as part of a reply to a lengthy text read, or a barrage of linked/embedded videos.
Yup. Too Long; Didn't Read. We should use one here for videos. TL;DW.

SF has a few posters who routinely start or respond to threads with lists of Googled links or YouTube videos. Not sure why they do that, or if anyone actually clicks on them. I sure don't.
 
I did admit NOT watching it because it was "way way too long". And then challenged someone to prove what I suspected wasn't true. And someone DID ASK. Yes some may appreciate that format but you didn't help by not warning, just posting the video for your audience having to find out. So my advice if someone posts a reasonably short video, no explanation necessary. But not so without a warning for long videos, especially for what as I noted most of us probably already are knowledgeable about.

I shared the video as a resource, not a prescription. You're free to skip it, but blaming the poster because you didn’t like the format or length is a bit much. It’s not a restaurant menu where every dish comes with a disclaimer. And the idea that a 19-minute video is "way too long" to learn something new says more about attention spans than content quality.
 
Yup. Too Long; Didn't Read. We should use one here for videos. TL;DW.

SF has a few posters who routinely start or respond to threads with lists of Googled links or YouTube videos. Not sure why they do that, or if anyone actually clicks on them. I sure don't.
Not directed at the OP of this thread but:
Because typing out a well thought out post takes effort, and commitment to the idea(s) presented.
 
I shared the video as a resource, not a prescription. You're free to skip it, but blaming the poster because you didn’t like the format or length is a bit much. It’s not a restaurant menu where every dish comes with a disclaimer. And the idea that a 19-minute video is "way too long" to learn something new says more about attention spans than content quality.
On the contrary, it speaks to having experienced videos that blather on without getting to the point.
 
Summary:

Almonds – Heart health, blood sugar stability, brain function, and muscle preservation
Oatmeal – Cholesterol control, digestion, and sleep support
Steamed Broccoli – Immunity, gut health, bone strength, and cognitive protection
Greek Yogurt – Muscle maintenance, probiotics, calcium, and B12 for brain and bone health
Kiwi – Immunity boost, blood pressure control, and better digestion and sleep
Cottage Cheese – Slow-digesting protein, strong bones, B12 and phosphorus for longevity
Blueberries – Antioxidants, reduced inflammation, brain health, and heart protection

No doubt there are many more foods that can aid us in practicing good health. As far as I can see, this video suggests that if we choose to eat healthy foods at dinner or snacking on healthy food before bedtime, it will play a part in how our body works while we sleep. How is it different from watching a video on exercises for seniors? No one is trying to promote that we do only a certain type of exercise, but rather saying that we need to keep our bodies and muscles in good condition. It is our choice.
 
Yup. Too Long; Didn't Read. We should use one here for videos. TL;DW.
SF has a few posters who routinely start or respond to threads with lists of Googled links or YouTube videos. Not sure why they do that, or if anyone actually clicks on them. I sure don't.

TL;DW = Too Lazy; Dismissed Wisdom. That’s your choice, but don’t pretend it’s a virtue.
 
On the contrary, it speaks to having experienced videos that blather on without getting to the point.

Sure, some videos ramble, but that’s true of books, articles, and even forum posts. It’s odd to treat one bad experience as proof the entire format isn’t worth trying. Dismissing content before engaging with it just guarantees you won’t learn anything new, efficient or not.
 
Everyone values their time. Some of us just choose to spend it expanding our understanding instead of shrinking our tolerance.
Spare me. Not watching a 20 minute video whose "wisdom" likely could have been condensed into two minutes says nothing of how much time I spend expanding my understanding in general, nor in the field of human nutrition in particular.

Why are you so defensive about this video?
 
Yup. Too Long; Didn't Read. We should use one here for videos. TL;DW.

SF has a few posters who routinely start or respond to threads with lists of Googled links or YouTube videos. Not sure why they do that, or if anyone actually clicks on them. I sure don't.
Same here.
To me, it makes no sense to post links/videos with zero commentary.
If they don't have a single comment to make, why should I?
 
Spare me. Not watching a 20 minute video whose "wisdom" likely could have been condensed into two minutes says nothing of how much time I spend expanding my understanding in general, nor in the field of human nutrition in particular. Why are you so defensive about this video?

Defensive? Hardly. I just find it funny when someone trashes content they haven’t engaged with, then acts offended when called out on it. If you're confident in your nutritional knowledge, why feel threatened by a 20-minute refresher?
 
Defensive? Hardly. I just find it funny when someone trashes content they haven’t engaged with, then acts offended when called out on it. If you're confident in your nutritional knowledge, why feel threatened by a 20-minute refresher?
Since you're so sold on him, I went on the Youtube video site to check out the guy's credentials (which he doesn't list) or the channel's credentials (also not listed). Took a screen shot of the videos on the channel. Talk about miles of clickbait. ("No More Dementia! Top 8 Fruits to Eat Now!")

Their description of their channel:

Healtness

"Description

"Welcome to Healtness, your ultimate destination for all things health and wellness! We are here to guide and inspire you on your journey toward a happier, healthier life. Our channel is dedicated to providing you with expert knowledge, practical tips, and engaging content on a wide range of topics including nutrition, fitness, mental well-being, and self-care.

Remember, your health is your greatest asset, and at Healtness, we are dedicated to helping you unlock your full potential. "Healtness" Meaning:The name "Healtness" was carefully crafted to reflect our channel's core focus on health and fitness. We combined the beginning of the word health (HEALT) and the end of the word fitness (NESS) to create "HEALTNESS." This intentional combination emphasizes our specialization in the field of health, which sets us apart from traditional fitness-centric content. Stay tuned, stay motivated, and welcome to Healtness, where health meets happiness!"


I'm done with this topic and this channel. If you think Healtness is a worthy site of following, knock yourself out.

Healtness.JPG
 
Same here. To me, it makes no sense to post links/videos with zero commentary.
If they don't have a single comment to make, why should I?

WOW! We've got a little echo chamber going here. StarSong and That Lady in PA reinforcing each other’s intellectual laziness like it’s a virtue. You're basically saying, “If I have to think or explore on my own, I’m out.” And then you're framing it like I'm the one being inconsiderate for daring to share information. Truly Amazing! Bottom-line, posting a link is a comment, it’s saying, "Here’s something worth considering." Not everyone needs to pre-chew content for others. If someone’s genuinely curious, they’ll click on it. If not, that’s fine, but dismissing others for sharing resources just because they didn’t spoon-feed you a summary? That says more about the reader than the poster.
 
Since you're so sold on him, I went on the Youtube video site to check out the guy's credentials (which he doesn't list) or the channel's credentials (also not listed). Took a screen shot of the videos on the channel. Talk about miles of clickbait. ("No More Dementia! Top 8 Fruits to Eat Now!") I'm done with this topic and this channel. If you think Healtness is a worthy site of following, knock yourself out.

You scanned thumbnails and read a channel blurb, hardly the deep research one would expect from someone so concerned with credentials. But hey, if "I’m done" is your intellectual fallback, I won’t stand in the way.
 
WOW! We've got a little echo chamber going here. StarSong and That Lady in PA reinforcing each other’s intellectual laziness like it’s a virtue. You're basically saying, “If I have to think or explore on my own, I’m out.” And then you're framing it like I'm the one being inconsiderate for daring to share information. Truly Amazing! Bottom-line, posting a link is a comment, it’s saying, "Here’s something worth considering." Not everyone needs to pre-chew content for others. If someone’s genuinely curious, they’ll click on it. If not, that’s fine, but dismissing others for sharing resources just because they didn’t spoon-feed you a summary? That says more about the reader than the poster.
You seem to be forgetting that most of us have a limited amount of time to explore new areas of information. In economics, there is something called Opportunity Cost. Assume I have saved up $500 over past month. If I buy a new couch with that $500, I have lost the opportunity to get a new $500 suit of clothes. Or to pay down my credit card bill by $500. Or rent a cottage for a long weekend at the beach.

Time, like money is a limited asset for the vast majority of us. Our time is often more valuable than money especially as we age. So, we need a good reason to spend it on something such as clicking on links. Naked links give us little if any justification to spend our time on them. Therefore, we use the time studying a foreign language, playing with the grandkids, cooking a healthy meal, taking a refreshing nap, etc.


I believe the opportunity cost for a naked links is just too high. OTOH, if the explanation says something like “This link lists 8 ways the nutrients in blueberries can help people avoid diabetes, toe nail fungus, and post nasal drip” then a person is better informed as to their choice of how to use their time. And they might choose to click on the link.
 
Last edited:
I tried to find a good article in the use of so called naked links, advantages and disadvantages. Alas, a search brought up tons of material from soft porn sites. :oops: And little on how to best link to information. So, I’ll just leave it.
I fared better.

Why Naked Links in Articles Can Harm Your SEO and How to Fix Them​

Why Naked Links in Articles Can Harm Your SEO and How to Fix Them

Which says: "When users come across descriptive anchor text, they are generally more inclined to believe that the link will lead them to content that is both valuable and relevant. However, naked links can appear quite unprofessional or, at times, even spammy—particularly when the URL is lengthy and complicated. Because of this, there is a risk that user trust may diminish, which could result in a lower probability that readers will click through."​

I like this one:​

How do you feel about naked link posting?

Which poses:​

"The simple thing to do would be to make a rule that any post in the communities must contain some actual ideas and thoughts from the person making the post. If someone wants to share a link, they should at least write a few sentences saying explaining what the link is, why they are sharing it, do they agree with it, how they feel about it, if they have additional thoughts on it, etc."​

and there are many more. Some going back over 15 years!​

PS - I have NO idea why this is in bold, and I couldn't correct it! Sorry.​

 


Back
Top