Personally, I like seeing the pictures. Not sure why it would be a problem.Mellow Yellow,how many ****** times do I have to say this to you,PLEASE NO PICTURES!
Personally, I like seeing the pictures. Not sure why it would be a problem.Mellow Yellow,how many ****** times do I have to say this to you,PLEASE NO PICTURES!
Buckeye,when I started this thread 2 yrs ago I didn't include pictures because I prefer it that wayPersonally, I like seeing the pictures. Not sure why it would be a problem.
AFAIK, being the OP doesn't give you editorial or ownership rights, and you can't claim it as "my thread". Pictures and extended explanation of an historic event should be seen as a plus. As long as folks are staying on topic (today in history type posts) all should be good.Buckeye,when I started this thread 2 yrs ago I didn't include pictures because I prefer it that way
I got no complaints from others who were posting here
A couple weeks ago when I came to post here,I did not recognize my thread,it was 'hijacked' by others with endless pictures,taking up an entire page of info which really made me angry
I needed to tell other posters why I was so upset to please stop using pictures, use just a couple sentences to describe the history event
I've notice another poster has started a new history thread with pictures,good for her
I believe he's the one that lost his head.March 2nd
[h=3]1626[/h][h=3][/h]Charles I is crowned King of England. Fierce internal struggles between the monarchy and Parliament characterized 17th century English politics.
[/FONT]