Their leadership is/was evil, and they deserved what they got and anything that's coming, but 1,000s of civilians have died as a result of our war on Iran. They didn't to anything against us. And many of those civilians were children.
I believe in staying out of other countries. That said, many countries are likely viewed as having "evil leadership" but we do not attack them. As but one example, the country shown here, which literally prints its hateful view of America on its very postage stamps, as shown below:
I guess it depends if you are talking its former leader, the regime, or the people. I feel for the people.
I agree. They deserved it. And civilians wanted our help too. Unfortunately and sadly, taking out the regime can bring other loss.
Are you talking North Korea? Not the same at all. They are largely contained and not our biggest concern.I believe in staying out of other countries. That said, many countries are likely viewed as having "evil leadership" but we do not attack them. As but one example, the country shown here, which literally prints its hateful view of America on its very postage stamps, as shown below:
Yet we don't attack them. And why? Because they have nuclear weapons - the only thing in this world that has any chance of keeping one's enemies at bay.
MAD or mutually assured destruction works pretty good even on a smaller scale.I believe in staying out of other countries. That said, many countries are likely viewed as having "evil leadership" but we do not attack them. As but one example, the country shown here, which literally prints its hateful view of America on its very postage stamps, as shown below:
Yet we don't attack them. And why? Because they have nuclear weapons - the only thing in this world that has any chance of keeping one's enemies at bay.
First of all, I don't think the same of all of one group or generalize them.
By the way in all lightness, bass ackwards sometimes is the right stance.
How about some info and sources to back up the above claims.
No way.
