PSA - A red herring is a misleading or irrelevant point that shifts focus away from the central question.If a post mentions alcohol, there is one member here who contends that alcohol is a "red herring" in relation to the debate on tobacco (see post 202) but when that same member himself introduced Oxycontin to the thread (see post 106) he doesn't see that as a "red herring". He needs to familiarize himself with the meaning of "red herring," and use it correctly and consistently.
That wasn’t the point I was trying to make. I agree that there are times when it’s appropriate, perhaps even necessary, for the government to legislate behavior. But it’s a dangerous path, one that can slide toward unintended consequences with remarkable speed. Prohibition is the classic example, and the War on Drugs, (launched in 1971 and still grinding on half a century later), only reinforces the lesson. By any reasonable measure, we’re not winning that one. I don’t pretend to have the answer for how to curb harmful behavior, or whether the wiser course is simply to find ways to limit the damage it causes.Hey, apparently people should be free to addict themselves to Oxycontin and create great wealth for the Sackler family, if that's what they want. Or, in the case of the addicted, if that's what they're driven to do.
Thank you, MACK.I've always admired your precision in conveying your message.![]()
I believe you are. If not, why do you coddle and encourage the criminal and the drug addled and the insane?I'm not overly keen on laws that make myself, or others, less safe.