JBR
Well-known Member
We see in the news that, in America, parents have lately been held legally responsible for not precluding kids access to pistols or even assault rifles. Occasionally, a parent has even provided the weapon and ammunition. Their distraught, foolhardy kids sometimes then go somewhere and kill and injure a group of people
Seems like irresponsibility? It does to me. Are there reasonable bounds to permissiveness?
Today’s news. I learned about a case in my province involving a teenager in court with a conviction and the sentence announced today. A 16-year-old learner-license driver was arrested last July for driving with passengers (not licensed to do so) at excessive speed, then attempting to evade the pursuant highway patrol, exiting the freeway and ignoring a stop stop sign — at speeds up to 180km/hr (112 mph). The driver was in his step mother’s car. He’s been presented with a $1800 fine and a 12-month driving ban.
From what I’ve gathered, step-mum will not bear any of the legal brunt, but she’s reportedly reaped the costs related to the kid slamming her BMW into a parked heavy-duty truck at the abrupt end of the joyride. I don’t know if that s simply a steep increase in her auto insurance rate.
The police are, of course, recommending that parents have serious “talks” counseling their kids about responsibility.
I realize it was a quirky mental leap on my part to immediately think back to something that happened maybe 20 yeas ago, an incident that still strikes me as even more devastating to a parent. An Ontario couple stupidly endangered their daughter. The dad was a noted professional drag-strip racing figure, and the daughter shared her desire to one day be a racing driver. Somewhere along the way, the parents allowed her, at 17, to drive a jet-engine dragster. On a drag strip, in a solo (non-competitive) test run, she drove it to a speed of around 300 mph, and after she’d released the drag-chute to slow toward a cruising speed, a wind caught the vehicle and tossed it against a retaining wall. And that ended her life.
Well, at least the girl didn’t kill anyone else.

Seems like irresponsibility? It does to me. Are there reasonable bounds to permissiveness?
Today’s news. I learned about a case in my province involving a teenager in court with a conviction and the sentence announced today. A 16-year-old learner-license driver was arrested last July for driving with passengers (not licensed to do so) at excessive speed, then attempting to evade the pursuant highway patrol, exiting the freeway and ignoring a stop stop sign — at speeds up to 180km/hr (112 mph). The driver was in his step mother’s car. He’s been presented with a $1800 fine and a 12-month driving ban.
From what I’ve gathered, step-mum will not bear any of the legal brunt, but she’s reportedly reaped the costs related to the kid slamming her BMW into a parked heavy-duty truck at the abrupt end of the joyride. I don’t know if that s simply a steep increase in her auto insurance rate.
The police are, of course, recommending that parents have serious “talks” counseling their kids about responsibility.
I realize it was a quirky mental leap on my part to immediately think back to something that happened maybe 20 yeas ago, an incident that still strikes me as even more devastating to a parent. An Ontario couple stupidly endangered their daughter. The dad was a noted professional drag-strip racing figure, and the daughter shared her desire to one day be a racing driver. Somewhere along the way, the parents allowed her, at 17, to drive a jet-engine dragster. On a drag strip, in a solo (non-competitive) test run, she drove it to a speed of around 300 mph, and after she’d released the drag-chute to slow toward a cruising speed, a wind caught the vehicle and tossed it against a retaining wall. And that ended her life.
Well, at least the girl didn’t kill anyone else.