Now that's a nice Partisan response.
Now that's a nice Partisan response.
Republicans today would disown Eisenhower.
In response to:'Was that before or after Iran Contra or Trickle down economics?'
you wrote:
and my question is, is everything always a 'partisan response' or is it sometimes only a recognition of some fact? If those things did occur, why not just acknowledge it and accept that both parties have been responsible for acts that range from outright crooked to at the very least, downright embarrassing? On the other hand if those events didn't occur, then ask for recognition of that fact.
We should be demanding 'honesty in advertising' and politics no matter which party is being followed, it seems to me.
As a native Californian who lived under Reagan's governorship, I think he was a dud there and in Washington. People who admired him liked his B acting in Death Valley Days, methinks. Ronnie was a actor, a bad actor.Well, the fact that the response to my Reagan post dealt with a negative aspect of his term rather than a positive would indicate partisanship, wouldn't you agree?
For me it was JFK, and I almost joined the Peace Corp before he was assassinated. I was young and naive enough to be taken in by his charm and charisma. How about you?
Lyndon B. Johnston. He inspired me to join the Republican party.