I bought that one. It's an excellent film. I show it to my friends and preface it with, "It's about bird watching," and they all express disbelief, like, "Do we have to watch that?" But I make them watch it, and then they understand. The end credits are really special where it names almost all the birds too fast to keep track of. There's a lot of birds.I just watched The Big Year.
Have you watched the origin film of Dr. Strange? It's my favorite in the Marvel Universe, although I may be a minority here. The Multiverse of Madness was part of a lame downward spiral Disney got on thinking every film had to be about the Multiverse, and Dr. Strange lost a lot of luster there. The premise was done to death by Disney, with little or no creativity involved.My wife and I have been going through the Marvel movies in order since subscribing to Disney + and Hulu. The last movie we watched was "Doctor Strange : In the multiverse of madness". We have also been alternating with her picks since the Marvel movies are not always her thing. We watched a series called "Paradise" on hulu that was not too bad also.
Yes, I have seen the original Dr. Strange. I agree with you that the multiverse thing is getting a bit carried away. They are still throwing a good movie here and there, though. "Shang Chi and the 10 rings" was pretty good and I am looking forward to the new fantastic four movie , as well. The problem with going through them all is that you have to suffer with the duds as well as the good ones.Have you watched the origin film of Dr. Strange? It's my favorite in the Marvel Universe, although I may be a minority here. The Multiverse of Madness was part of a lame downward spiral Disney got on thinking every film had to be about the Multiverse, and Dr. Strange lost a lot of luster there. The premise was done to death by Disney, with little or no creativity involved.
But then followups to origin stories of superheroes seldom measure up in any case.
I saw that movie years later after it was released . I watched Blow Out when it was released and remember Ebert saying that De Palma based the movie entirely on the movie Blow-Up so that piqued my interest. A couple of years later I noticed in the "now showing" section of the newspaper that one of the local art movie theaters was going to show Blow -Up so I went to see it and it blew my mind. I think Blow Out is a good movie but it doesn't hold a candle to Blow-Up.View attachment 443623
Blow-up (1966)
I've probably watched Blow-up 4 or 5 times since first seeing it in 1966. I'm still as mesmerized by it's haunting atmosphere as I was in 1966. Directed by the great M. Antonioni, and starring David Hemmings, Vanessa Redgrave, and Sarah Miles, it may have been the first counter-cultural film-- certainly one to get such very high praise and award nominations.
Antonioni crafts a moody but edgy feel that permeates the entire film. The park scenes in particular, with no dialogue, and continuous wind driven rustling of the trees, invoke such an atmospheric quality that the experience stayed with me for months after first viewing the film in 1966.
Antonioni's film is a masterpiece. He was able to create a consuming mood that few others besides Coppola's The Conversation have been able to do.
The picture came out at the perfect point in time, which reflected both the youthful "Turn on, tune in, drop out" sentiment along with a nod to the Brit swinging '60s mentality.
It portrayed a slice of time in the life of a bored existential hip photographer whose routine was briefly interrupted and heightened by his accidental discovery of an hidden murder that resulted the theft of his equipment and library, only to return him back to his unrewarding life.
It was not a murder mystery, but a very absorbing reflection on the age old questions of who are we, and why are we here. Blow-up shows its influence in dozens of films, and you can be sure it is still deeply studied in film schools.
Doc's rating: 10/10
Prior to Disney taking over Marvel, there were a few dull films in the Marvel Universe like mediocre episodes in a series. I tend to not recognize them because they all contributed to the arc that terminated with End Game, if only in some minor way. I think the problem is with Disney, but it's possible that Marvel just ran it course and had nowhere else to go."Shang Chi and the 10 rings" was pretty good and I am looking forward to the new fantastic four movie , as well. The problem with going through them all is that you have to suffer with the duds as well as the good ones.