What would happen if college was free for all students?

@squatting dog and @C50

Apprenticeship programs still exist. Most of them are related to every aspect of construction, but technology-related apprenticeship programs are exploding.

But there are a lot fewer than there were, say, 40-50yrs ago. I think most of the current ones are through workers union
I know of Machinist Apprenticeships, Tool and Diemaker Apprenticeships, Plumber Apprenticeships. Electrician Apprenticeships,
HVAC Apprenticeships and more.
 
Would likely become like many community colleges seem to have become with significant numbers without anything better to do, like a working career or job, going to their local community colleges and then bringing along the same non-serious attitudes they did in high school where its more a convenient excuse to continue to socialize with others of like age. Also, many HR, human resource departments of corporations, have schemed with colleges to only bother looking at resumes with college credits or degrees, while instantly tossing those with just solid work experiences, despite such often being more important.

Note, this person doesn't have any college degrees, just a few credits. I did go to military electronics schools during the Viet Nam

War, but far far more of my education came from self reading technical and science books during my later working years. One of the first things I did, during my first civilian job that was in Palo Alto near Stanford, was going through page by page, the whole 640 page Texas Instruments, The TTL Data Book for Design Engineers, that had schematic drawings of internal device structures, figuring out how those digital circuits worked internally.
 
Last edited:
I financed my last two years of undergrad and much of grad school by giving some of my young adulthood to the USN. For me the GI Bill was a Godsend and changed my life. Unfortunately lots of worthless training was included in the program so far too much money was wasted.
 
Well, prior to 1998, in the UK, university (college) was free in the UK. Funding came from the tax payer.

I can't think of too many benefits from having an uneducated populace. And in my life time, a college education has been considered essential for my jobs/roles.

But then, like everything, it has become corrupted by greed. For example, the "success" of a college is often measured on how many students graduate with a degree, which appears to have the net effect of lowering standards in order to keep the marketing looking good.

Also, costs are now largely too high, and we've lost any sight of joined up thinking - what are we educating people for? When it's on the public dime, I think we should be helping to build a greater future, ensuring people have the skills to be successful in the society they'll function in. When it's paid for privately - well, I guess if you want to study flower arranging, then knock yourself out. So, when I was a lad, there was a new emphasis on Computer Science (as it was called then). This helped people get ready for the world we live in.

One problem today is that there seems to be a demand that a college education should guarantee employment. That seems to be regardless of the subject studied. It seems to only be dawning on people now that things don't work that way. Also, student loans are handed out too easily to 18 year olds, at obscene interest rates, that shackle them for decades.
 
I know of Machinist Apprenticeships, Tool and Diemaker Apprenticeships, Plumber Apprenticeships. Electrician Apprenticeships,
HVAC Apprenticeships and more.
I don't know if they're still doing it or not, but a few years ago some healthcare facilities in the region offered free CNA classes for individuals who agreed to work there for a specific period of time afterward. I thought that was a good idea.
 
I don't know if they're still doing it or not, but a few years ago some healthcare facilities in the region offered free CNA classes for individuals who agreed to work there for a specific period of time afterward. I thought that was a good idea.

An excellent idea, not too far from the idea of apprenticeships.
 
Theoretically, we could have AI professors in the near future with students learning from home, which would eliminate the need for college and university campuses. We already have online college classes, but anybody who has ever taken one of them knows they're really awful. It's been some 15 years since I took one, so they might have improved since then, but I doubt it. With AI, we could have actual lectures on the subject matter and even discussions. I guess, along with that, the AI professor would evaluate your contributions and knowledge. It could quiz you and test your ability to think logically.

Most of the cost of colleges and universities these days isn't with professors, though; it's with administration. Many of those jobs could be replaced by AI.

Personally, I wouldn't have a problem with an AI professor. Unless you're doing research, college professors are just regurgitating what's in the textbooks. AI professors would be perfectly suited for something like that.

So with AI taking over much of the teaching and administration, and with less need for large campuses, college could be free without much cost to taxpayers.
 
I just happened to find what you posted. I am not getting notifications of my quoted posts most of the time.

There is a possibility that eliminating the Federal Dept. of Education could happen, but it will require an act of Congress.

However, it's a viable option I suppose, since AI says Implementing a national free college program for all could cost approximately 58 billion in the first year and 800 billion over a decade, and goes on to say, "The U.S. Department of Education's total outlays for fiscal year 2024 were approximately $268 billion, representing about 4% of total federal spending."

Abolishing the Dept. of Education would shift much responsibility to the states as well as to the Dept. of Health and Human Services, which, as we know, oversees CMS, and therefore, Medicare.
If we could rely on the Constitution and Supreme Court rulings alone, I wager at least 100 federal regulatory and guideline agencies could be eliminated. Probably over 200. And I'm referring to regulatory and guideline agencies only, not investigative agencies such as the FCC.

Most regulatory agencies at the federal level are duplicates of state regulatory agencies. Simply put, they're toilets that flush trillions in tax dollars. Our federal income tax would be greatly reduced if these redundant agencies were eliminated, and states could raise their taxes to improve their functionality, including social services, according to their industry and the needs of their citizens.
 
Back
Top