tbeltrans
Senior Member
Agreed. Notice first that StarSong said "credible" scientists. These would be the real scientists with a track record in research. Then, consider that we are all learning about this virus together so we have to expect that scientists will get some things wrong along the way, but will correct previous statements when new data shows previous observations to be false. Remember that science deals mostly in hypothesis, so that whatever science says it knows currently, is always open to change if and when new data comes to light that requires such correction. Over the course of this virus, we have seen conflicting views among those scientists and medical people doing the research as each involved collected new data. Unfortunately, politics has played a far too large role in this, muddying the waters so it is difficult for the general public to know which end is up and what to do.Credible scientists don't lie. They respond and refine their positions as more data comes to light.
Over time, what the general public is to do has been distilled into a few easy to understand action items such as wearing masks, social distance, wash hands frequently.
For me personally, it is not particularly important at this point to know where the virus originated. The "who is at fault" blame thing seems to me to be more about politics. To researchers, determining where it originated and how, is important because they will want to more thoroughly understand the virus and possibly address the situation that allowed the virus to transfer to humans as a preventative measure in the future. Also, such study may help to make the response to the next similar virus more efficient and therefore, help save lives.
Tony