MarkD
Keeper of the Hounds & Garden
- Location
- San Francisco Bay Area
I spent quite a bit of time on the thread you started on that site. It's interesting that there are enough people there to create a website that holds to what is traditionally a fundamentalist concept, but still make allowances for science in Christianity. I can actually relate to this, while disagreeing with them at the same time.
I came from a fundamentalist (Baptist) extended family that shared a house with two separate flats. Grandparents upstairs, and my immediate family downstairs. My grandmother first laid out her religious truths when I was in the youngest of my formative years. And she didn't wait for me to learn how to think. I don't know how old I was, but I only have a few memories that are old enough for me not to have yet developed a sense of time and my place in it. I remember her telling me about the most important thing in life, and I remember it vividly because it was an absolute horror story, and the first time I ever heard about God and his grand plans.
My father and uncle had been indoctrinated years earlier and I attribute much of my father's misery and depression to her teachings, although much of his problems may have been due to chemical imbalance, so I'll just say Grandmother didn't help. My mother was not a fundamentalist, and must have put her foot down and told my father that her children were not going to be raised that way, so in the downstairs flat we settled on the less horrifying Lutheran Church. But Grandmother's first introduction to the "true" god was now well ingrained deep in my psyche. My mother must have had words with my grandmother about taking responsibility for my religious upbringing, but all I really know is there was some bad blood between them, which was never discussed in detail.
So around the age of 5, I started to question religion. Some of it made no sense, and the situation was not helped by absurd Bible stories, but I managed to hang on to a faith over the years by making up a new Christianity and continually modifying it, much like the YEC people in your forum do. I considered myself a Christian, but not a Lutheran, Baptist, or even Bible Christian. I was never able to reconcile Bible Christianity with the reality around me. In my early 50s, I had a dramatic insight. I was an atheist, and probably had been for years, while trying to pass as a believer, because atheist is an ugly sounding description to me.
It's not that Bible Christianity, Christianity, Mormon, my modified versions, or Buddhist religions were absolutely wrong. It was just that I could find no compelling evidence to believe in any of them.
Your guys don't seem too bad, actually. And for what it's worth, my two closest friends where I have settled in the last 15 years are a married fundamentalist couple.
I thank you for checking it out. I understand your feelings in this. While I have found the crew there overall welcoming there have been some who had a very strong reaction against me. Disagreement is taken as an insult to their deity by some Christians even if it is their feelings that fuel their response.
I have a friend in Germany who has posted at both Biologos and here who has a similar religious orientation to me who was treated pretty roughly. I'd say we are both examples of people who come to religions as the perennial philosophy of which Aldous Huxley wrote, something that recurs outside of tradition. In some ways, never having been a practicing Christian as an adult as in my case was less of an affront that someone they saw as apostate. Most of the moderators are outstanding and I consider them friends.
The way I see it, traditional religion serves us all by way of keeping alive the idea that there is a hidden dimension to life imbedded in what is seen. Though I never read the Bible or attended a church past early elementary school my imagination was still fed some potent archetypes which strongly shaped who I've become. One reason I can coexist well with Christians is I recognize the gift I was given and the other came from reading the American Jungian psychologist, James Hillman who wrote a lot about the soul in a psychological sense.
Hillman advocated embracing belief if you had it and not letting a modernistic mindset stop you if you didn't. After all when it comes to dreams, pathologies, or other products of the psyche, everything we experience has an as-if quality. Dreams have no empirical implications and neither must the archetypes and deities one may experience. Those who have a good relationship to the deeper, productive levels of their psyches are better off in terms of fulfilling their humanity and finding meaning and fulfillment - those not being arbitrary things we just make up. They're their and we just have to be on good enough terms with our deeper self to reap the rewards.
I've never felt the need to tell anyone their belief is wrong and I don't think it is -quite the contrary as Hillman suggests. I learned to speak of sacred things in a way not offensive to Christians. Not so much to ask, only the thin skinned and more literally minded objected that I just wasn't one of them. In the beginning instead of saying God I would refer to the something greater I always intuited was there inside us as 'that which gives rise to and still supports God belief'. I could truthfully say of that that I thought it was real, dynamic and important.
Another thread I started there which has been the source of many good books for me I called "Pithy quotes which give us pause to reflect" which is the 197th post in the thread. Here Merv who is a mod and a very fair minded and intelligent thinker shares a book called Holy Envy by Barbara Brown Taylor which I enjoyed tremendously and later shared other quotes from too.
In the 432nd post in the same thread I shared a quote from Wendell Berry's novel Jayber Crow in which he describes a human soul more beautifully than anything else I've read. This recommendation came to me in a list of 20 most recommended books shared by another moderator Phil who is older like me, probably less adventurous in his reading habits but just as fair minded. There are many others in there too but it is a huge thread.
If you decide to give it a try I hope you get a better reception than my friend Rob did. I've taken a couple breaks from it because sometimes a young gun apologist comes along that just wants to bag me so bad that it becomes unbearable. I think Christianity may be the only religion that is hell ben on converting everyone or maybe Islam is another.