Would The World Be Better & Safer Without Islam?

L

Lon

Well-known Member
Location
Central California
Islam and it's three branches of Sunni, Shia, Druze seem to be the main instigators of strife in the world today, not only amongst themselves, but towards all infidels. So would we have a better, happier and safer world if their was no Islam. I think there is a viable solution.
 

You left out the christians. They cause their fair share of strife and always have. Fact is, if they hadn't been so determined to wipe out Islam several centuries ago, we wouldn't be in this fix with them.
 
Let's not forget Israel's bombing of the Palestinians last summer, as well as war crimes committed by the Israelis during this last attempt at "mowing the grass."
 

3horsefarm said:
You left out the christians. They cause their fair share of strife and always have. Fact is, if they hadn't been so determined to wipe out Islam several centuries ago, we wouldn't be in this fix with them.
Click to expand...

That was the 11th century & The Crusades, but Christians have not been a cause of world wide chaos since, unlike Islam.
 
Shalimar said:
Let's not forget Israel's bombing of the Palestinians last summer, as well as war crimes committed by the Israelis during this last attempt at "mowing the grass."
Click to expand...

The Jews and Israel have not been responsible for world wide terror or atrocities. Are you saying that present acts committed on behalf of Islamic ideology is justified because of perceived war crimes committed by Israel? You gotta be kiddin me.
 
Lon with respect, Zionism has been and is culpable of acts of terrorism, whether or not classified as world wide. No, I am not suggesting Islamic terrorist acts are justified by Israel's war crimes. I am attempting to insert balance into what I perceive as anti-Islam bias.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bee
Lon, at the beginning of your thread you did not actually use the phrase world wide terrorism, but asked if the world would be safer without Islam. I believe my remarks addressed the question as it was written.
 
Shalimar said:
Lon with respect, Zionism has been and is culpable of acts of terrorism, whether or not classified as world wide. No, I am not suggesting Islamic terrorist acts are justified by Israel's war crimes. I am attempting to insert balance into what I perceive as anti-Islam bias.
Click to expand...

How can you possibly insert balance when Islam has been the primary cause of International terrorism and violence for the past decade and then some. Christians and Jews are not preaching Death to America/ Death to Infidels/Death to Islam. As an American Atheist I am considered an Infidel and that gives me cause for concern on two counts.
 
Here's my solution. How about systematic elimination of all Mullah's & Ayatollah's since they are the interpretors of Islamic teachings as well as negotiations with the West and do not represent the wishes or even best interests of the people. Leave the Imam's since their main function is leading prayer. I'm Talking Covert Assassination.
 
Lon said:
Here's my solution. How about systematic elimination of all Imam's & Ayatollah's since they are the interpretors of Islamic teachings as well as negotiations with the West and do not represent the wishes or even best interests of the people. Leave the Imam's since their main function is leading prayer. I'm Talking Covert Assassination.
Click to expand...

There are 1.6 billion muslims. Are you suggesting all should be 'disposed of'?
 
Shalimar said:
Lon, at the beginning of your thread you did not actually use the phrase world wide terrorism, but asked if the world would be safer without Islam. I believe my remarks addressed the question as it was written.
Click to expand...

My apologies, I should have made my post more clear. Her is part of my post "Islam and it's three branches of Sunni, Shia, Druze seem to be the main instigators of strife in the world today. I guess strife was not sufficient.
 
We are no better than HITLER if we were to practice worldwide assassination of any group. No thanks. I don't know the solution but I know about Hitlers "final solution".
 
Ameriscot said:
There are 1.6 billion muslims. Are you suggesting all should be 'disposed of'?
Click to expand...
I didn't say all.

Of course not, but the Ayatollahs and Mullahs are responsible for interpreting the ideology and promoting ideas that run contrary to most Muslims wishes, and they are the ones that must be eliminated. Imam's primary function is to lead prayer and they can stay.
 
AZ Jim said:
We are no better than HITLER if we were to practice worldwide assassination of any group. No thanks. I don't know the solution but I know about Hitlers "final solution".
Click to expand...

C'mon Jim I am talking about just the Mullah's and Ayatollah's who are no better than Hitler, not the general population of Muslims'

.
 
Lon said:
C'mon Jim I am talking about just the Mullah's and Ayatollah's who are no better than Hitler, not the general population of Muslims'

.
Click to expand...

Ok....and the entire Islamic community is going lie down and be nice, huh? Get real, a new and more determined leader would emerge and it would be a major draw for more followers anxious to be martyrs and to join their 71 virgins. No thanks.
 
AZ Jim said:
Ok....and the entire Islamic community is going lie down and be nice, huh? Get real, a new and more determined leader would emerge and it would be a major draw for more followers anxious to be martyrs and to join their 71 virgins. No thanks.
Click to expand...

What do you think the entire German community would have done if England had been successful with their assignation attempts on Hitler?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top