Georgia dad is charged 'after beating a 20-year-old man he found in his 14-year-old daughter's bedroom.

Authorities in Georgia say an enraged father took things too far and crossed a line, resulting in his arrest, after he found a grown man in his 14-year-old daughter's bedroom.

Ismael Casillas, 41, has been charged with aggravated assault for allegedly attacking and severely beating 20-year-old Keywontrezes Humphries in the early hours of July 4 after finding the man at the family's home in Coweta County.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...arged-beating-man-20-teen-daughters-room.html
 

The father certainly did cross a line. (What's wrong with calling the police and having the guy arrested on child molestation charges?)

That father, who clearly has anger control issues to put it mildly, is lucky that he is apparently a lousy shot. Otherwise, he would be up on a murder charge.

I wonder if race played some part in this? Would this trigger-happy idiot have reacted the same way if the guy had been white? The pictures shown along with this article tell a lot of the story.
 
Reading between the lines on this article, unless the parents were utterly blind to, or oblivious of their daughters nature, I'd say red flags as to the daughters behaviour would have been present and apparent long before this latest happening unfolded, so I say shame on the parents, too.
 
I agree, Marg, and I also think there is a big difference in what is an appropriate reaction from the father, depending on what part the daughter played in this. Was the guy there by her invitation? Or did he manage to get her address and then break in, in order to rape her?
 
Was she a willing participant, or did he show up uninvited? Here in Pennsylvania, it wouldn't matter. Girls (and guys) under the age of 18 cannot say "Yes" to having sex with an older man. So, even if he came invited, he would not have been able to have sex with her legally, even if she was willing.

As for Daddy, well, he's probably going to get off the hook. You would be surprised at how many people sympathize with the parent in these situations. I'll bet Butterfly has seen these cases and will tell you the same thing. Most likely, they will cut a deal for maybe a fine and probation. If Daddy is working and supporting his family, it's very likely to play out that way. This is one of the reasons the court will do a pre-sentencing investigation.

One thing is for certain after looking at the dude's picture; he sure got an ass-whooping. But, you guys are right. The parents need to keep a closer eye and maybe a shorter leash on the girl.
 
Last edited:
I didn't go to read the story....and details do matter....such as,
was he firing a shot into the air, to frighten or to warn or to signal, to the man never to go near his daughter again?
 
I didn't go to read the story....and details do matter....such as,
was he firing a shot into the air, to frighten or to warn or to signal, to the man never to go near his daughter again?
I cringe at the thought of someone being so brain-dead as to firing a gun into the air.
 
I agree with you, Aunt Marg.
I just thought he might be judged somewhat differently, by some, if he had not intentionally shot to kill.
But like I say, I didn't care to read the story, so I will stop my comments. :)
 
I agree with you, Aunt Marg.
I just thought he might be judged somewhat differently, by some, if he had not intentionally shot to kill.
But like I say, I didn't care to read the story, so I will stop my comments. :)
I've been thinking the same thing, Kaila. Do hope he is punished accordingly though.
 
Was she a willing participant, or did he show up uninvited? Here in Pennsylvania, it wouldn't matter. Girls (and guys) under the age of 18 cannot say "Yes" to having sex with an older man. So, even if he came invited, he would not have been able to have sex with her legally, even if she was willing.

As for Daddy, well, he's probably going to get off the hook. You would be surprised at how many people sympathize with the parent in these situations. I'll bet Butterfly has seen these cases and will tell you the same thing. Most likely, they will cut a deal for maybe a fine and probation. If Daddy is working and supporting his family, it's very likely to play out that way. This is one of the reasons the court will do a pre-sentencing investigation.

One thing is for certain after looking at the dude's picture; he sure got an ass-whooping. But, you guys are right. The parents need to keep a closer eye and maybe a shorter leash on the girl.

On this topic specifically, my opinion is the law is wrong- because it gives kids the message they can do whatever they want and be held blameless.

On the subject of age in general, though, trends are going in the wrong direction. It's gone back to 'old enough for THIS but not old enough for THAT' that was the way many decades ago, but getting even worse.
Example: states passing laws where minors cannot marry under any circumstances.. yet kids as young as 10, 12, 13, are 'parenting.'
Example: individuals under age 21 cannot buy tobacco or vaping products- yet nothing is done about older people providing young teens with alcohol and illegal drugs.
I'm sure some of the older members here can relate to 'back in the day' when it was 'he's old enough to get drafted, but he's not old enough to vote!'

Also, a work project that came up today- when a 12-year-old intentionally killed a young child, he was set to be tried as an adult. Why would a 12-year-old be considered mature enough and responsible enough for this, while at the same time individuals of 16 or 17 can't marry and 19-20-year olds can't buy cigarettes because they're now considered 'children'???

Back to the OP- if I'd been the parent in that situation, my reaction would not have been pleasant, and that's an understatement. However, I'd not look at it as 'the guy was a criminal and the girl was blameless.'
 
Was she a willing participant, or did he show up uninvited? Here in Pennsylvania, it wouldn't matter. Girls (and guys) under the age of 18 cannot say "Yes" to having sex with an older man. So, even if he came invited, he would not have been able to have sex with her legally, even if she was willing.

As for Daddy, well, he's probably going to get off the hook. You would be surprised at how many people sympathize with the parent in these situations. I'll bet Butterfly has seen these cases and will tell you the same thing. Most likely, they will cut a deal for maybe a fine and probation. If Daddy is working and supporting his family, it's very likely to play out that way. This is one of the reasons the court will do a pre-sentencing investigation.

One thing is for certain after looking at the dude's picture; he sure got an ass-whooping. But, you guys are right. The parents need to keep a closer eye and maybe a shorter leash on the girl.

I didn't mean to imply that the guy could have had sex with her legally if she complied. I just meant that the father's reaction might have been more understandable if the guy had tricked the girl somehow, or forced his way in, rather than he was there by her invitation.

If it was by her invitation, the father still had every right to turn the guy over to the law. And the daughter should have had her xbox permanently removed, and probably been grounded for a while. I just don't think good old Dad should have been committing violence on him. Truthfully, the whole setup looks pretty sordid to me. The term "trailer trash" comes to mind.
 
I didn't mean to imply that the guy could have had sex with her legally if she complied. I just meant that the father's reaction might have been more understandable if the guy had tricked the girl somehow, or forced his way in, rather than he was there by her invitation.

If it was by her invitation, the father still had every right to turn the guy over to the law. And the daughter should have had her xbox permanently removed, and probably been grounded for a while. I just don't think good old Dad should have been committing violence on him. Truthfully, the whole setup looks pretty sordid to me. The term "trailer trash" comes to mind.
No problem here. I was just citing PA law. Who knows, maybe Georgia law is different.
 
Why does this whole story sound familiar ? Same scenario , similar results, sometime back.

As for the father ? I support him , except for the gun firing. Would support that as well, if he had actually shot the guy. At least shot at him. But just a random shot in the air could hit an innocent person.........
 
Why does this whole story sound familiar ? Same scenario , similar results, sometime back.

As for the father ? I support him , except for the gun firing. Would support that as well, if he had actually shot the guy. At least shot at him. But just a random shot in the air could hit an innocent person.........
So in the USofA, you can shoot people randomly just for the sake of shooting them, even when your life is not in danger?
 
Last edited:
So in the USofA, you can shoot people randomly just for the sake of shooting them, even when your life is not in danger?


It would not have been "just for the sake of shooting him" It would have been for unlawful entry into his house. IMO even if the daughter had invited him in , it is not the daughter's house ...... The father found an intruder.
 
It would not have been "just for the sake of shooting him" It would have been for unlawful entry into his house. IMO even if the daughter had invited him in , it is not the daughter's house ...... The father found an intruder.
So you have the local viewpoint that kids are nothing more than boarders?
 


Back
Top