grahamg
Old codger
- Location
- South of Manchester, UK
I've heard it said that those prone to bullying were first bullied themselves, and this brought out their behaviour.
I want to shed a little doubt on that viewpoint, (not that I'm suggesting bullies were not themselves once bullied, but this in itself does not prove "cause and effect").
On another thread it has been suggested that men or women whose partners left them for another, may mean they are less likely to be guilty of infidelity themselves, because "they know what it feels like".
Hence the argument, or logic being put forward in either situation, bullying or infidelity, one is supposed to lead to a possible improvement in behaviour, whilst the other forces the person into bad behaviour.
Is it not possible bullies were pretty much born the way they are, and far from them being bullied caused their bad behaviour, it was their tendency to try to bully others that brought about whatever bullying they suffered?
I want to shed a little doubt on that viewpoint, (not that I'm suggesting bullies were not themselves once bullied, but this in itself does not prove "cause and effect").
On another thread it has been suggested that men or women whose partners left them for another, may mean they are less likely to be guilty of infidelity themselves, because "they know what it feels like".
Hence the argument, or logic being put forward in either situation, bullying or infidelity, one is supposed to lead to a possible improvement in behaviour, whilst the other forces the person into bad behaviour.
Is it not possible bullies were pretty much born the way they are, and far from them being bullied caused their bad behaviour, it was their tendency to try to bully others that brought about whatever bullying they suffered?