Some factual information about Dr. Fauci

[Nathan]

Fauci's upcoming book has been scrubbed by both Amazon and Barnes & Noble. What do they know that you don't? Smells like major backlash - smoke, fire and all that. History is not going to be kind to this man.

I hope that's true, I'm sure it would be a major disappointment for you if that turned out to be yet more fake news. I can't even guess as to what triggers your hatred of honest, hard working public figures. ?
Actually I could guess, and probably be correct, but I don't want to run afoul of forum policy.

 

[Pink Biz]

Dr. Anthony Fauci is set to release a book on COVID and appear in a new Disney-backed documentary despite being accused of multiple flip-flops on the virus.

On Tuesday, it was revealed that the infectious disease expert, 80, will publish a tome titled 'Expect the Unexpected: Ten Lessons on Truth, Service, and the Way Forward'. It will be released by National Geographic Books on November 2.

A spokesperson from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases told DailyMail.com that Fauci won't be paid for the project.

Both Barnes & Noble and Amazon have listed the 80-page book for pre-order at the price of $18.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...k-TRUTH-appear-Disney-backed-documentary.html

 

[JonDouglas]

From the FOIA release:

 

[JonDouglas]

One last parting shot that might help people understand why the guns are trained on Fauci.

Real professionals don't prevaricate or flip-flop. Real professionals don't seek out the spotlight. Real professionals know what they don't know and don't pretend otherwise, Real professionals aren't swayed by political winds.

 

[JonDouglas]

Statements from someone familiar with all of this:

 

[Nathan]

From the FOIA release:
Image link

So just to try and help you lend some credence: who exactly made this FOIA request? I'm sure they were bitterly disappointed with the result, an utterly meaningless memo... I doubt the authenticity of this image, any middle school child could construct a much more conviencing one.

 

[Nathan]

One last parting shot that might help people understand why the guns are trained on Fauci.
---Cute image removed---

Real professionals don't prevaricate or flip-flop. Real professionals don't seek out the spotlight. Real professionals know what they don't know and don't pretend otherwise, Real professionals aren't swayed by political winds.

While I disagree with your premise that Dr. Fauci is guilty of the above mentioned transgressions, I should point out that "real professionals" will change their minds on issues when the discovery of new conditions warrant...that is how science works.

 

[Nathan]

Statements from someone familiar with all of this:
media link

...yet more hot air and nay-saying from a politically slanted media outlet.

You know what @JonDouglas , The title of this thread is "Some factual information about Dr. Fauci", so if you feel compelled to continue posting this type of swill then why don't you start a new thread, maybe titled "Some fairy tale hogwash about Dr. Fauci".

 

[JonDouglas]

NY Post: Fauci finally admits COVID-19 may have come from a ‘lab leak’ after his emails exposed

PS: Nathan, I am not sure but I don't think anyone has anointed you the sheriff of this thread or the judge of what is or isn't swill. That said, I hope you're in good health and having a nice day otherwise.

 

[Nathan]

NY Post: Fauci finally admits COVID-19 may have come from a ‘lab leak’ after his emails exposed

PS: Nathan, I am not sure but I don't think anyone has anointed you the sheriff of this thread or the judge of what is or isn't swill. That said, I hope you're in good health and having a nice day otherwise.

You are correct, nobody did anoint me as sheriff of this thread, although I admit that I have not checked my email yet today. As for being "the judge" of what is or isn't swill, I can tell you this, that I can recognize swill when I see it, as can most readers here, I'm sure. The suggestion that you start your own thread was a practical one, whose purpose was to preserve content continuity and quality. If I were intent on forcing you out of posting in this thread, don't you think I would have said something to that effect? At any rate, it is a pleasant day today, so have a good one yourself.

 

[squatting dog]

So just to try and help you lend some credence: who exactly made this FOIA request? I'm sure they were bitterly disappointed with the result, an utterly meaningless memo... I doubt the authenticity of this image, any middle school child could construct a much more conviencing one.

Through the Freedom of Information Act, The Washington Post and BuzzFeed obtained and made public Dr. Anthony Fauci's email ...


The emails are damning and prove that Fauci lied over and over again (including under oath).

If they were phoney, then why would White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki on Thursday deflect when she was asked about Fauci’s emails.
Psaki said... “He’s been an undeniable asset in our country’s pandemic response but it’s obviously not that advantageous for me to re-litigate the substance of emails from 17 months ago.”

 

[ProTruckDriver]

Mark my words, Fauci will retire sometime this year, may be soon. People are getting tired of the flip flopping decisions. I doubt if he sells a lot of books. Who would want to read a book about Covid when we hear it every day. Right / Left doesn't matter, Fauci is history, gone. After he retires and if he goes on the cable news networks, who cares. Their rating are dropping like a rock, people are not watching anymore.

 

[Irwin]

Never mind.

 

[ProTruckDriver]

What "flip-flop decisions?"

Here is some:

 

[JonDouglas]

Sometimes history can be instructive. I believe this is from Robert Kennedy Jr.’s Children’s Health Defense (3/27/20):

"For example, [Dr. Anthony] Fauci once shilled for the fast-tracked H1N1 influenza (‘swine flu’) vaccine on YouTube, reassuring viewers in 2009 that serious adverse events were ‘very, very, very rare.’ Shortly thereafter, the vaccine went on to wreak havoc in multiple countries, increasing miscarriage risks in pregnant women in the U.S., provoking a spike in adolescent narcolepsy in Scandinavia and causing febrile convulsions in one in every 110 vaccinated children in Australia—prompting the latter to suspend its influenza vaccination program in under-fives.”​

Such are the dangers of being a media darling when it's found out that you're mostly just another pandering bureaucrat. This is my opinion and I am entitled to it.

 

[Nathan]

Sometimes history can be instructive. I believe this is from Robert Kennedy Jr.’s Children’s Health Defense (3/27/20):

"For example, [Dr. Anthony] Fauci once shilled for the fast-tracked H1N1 influenza (‘swine flu’) vaccine on YouTube, reassuring viewers in 2009 that serious adverse events were ‘very, very, very rare.’ Shortly thereafter, the vaccine went on to wreak havoc in multiple countries, increasing miscarriage risks in pregnant women in the U.S., provoking a spike in adolescent narcolepsy in Scandinavia and causing febrile convulsions in one in every 110 vaccinated children in Australia—prompting the latter to suspend its influenza vaccination program in under-fives.”​

Such are the dangers of being a media darling when it's found out that you're mostly just another pandering bureaucrat. This is my opinion and I am entitled to it.

You are full of opinions to which you are undeniably entitled. It's your attempts to push your opinions onto others that is getting tiresome.

 

[Butterfly]

If doctors and researchers were never able to "flip-flop" when new information comes to light or new discoveries are made, we'd all still be dying of smallpox, polio, typhoid, etc., and have no antibiotics, anesthesia, blood transfusions, organ transplants, or anything else and we'd still in the middle ages as far as health care goes.

Geez!!!

 

[JonDouglas]

If doctors and researchers were never able to "flip-flop" when new information comes to light or new discoveries are made, we'd all still be dying of smallpox, polio, typhoid, etc., and have no antibiotics, anesthesia, blood transfusions, organ transplants, or anything else and we'd still in the middle ages as far as health care goes.

Geez!!!

Just as an FYI, flip-flopping as the result of new light on something is not quite the same as saying one thing in public then flip-flopping in public while saying the original thing in private. That's called lying or being two-faced.

 

[Sunny]

There nothing like one of my posts to get you going, is there, Nathan? Well here's another tidbit about your hero. Fauci's upcoming book has been scrubbed by both Amazon and Barnes & Noble. What do they know that you don't? Smells like major backlash - smoke, fire and all that. History is not going to be kind to this man.

JonDouglas, I'd love to know the source of the above disinformation. Are you willing to share it with us? Or did you just make it up?

 

[JonDouglas]

Since we're back on the subject of Fauci and rather than hurling juvenile internet insults, I read an interesting observation by an American physicist and psychoanalyst (J. Satinover, MD, PhD). He made the following observations about the Fauci emails that were released.

1. Almost ALL of the emails are from others to Fauci with his reply. There are very few, if any (I will have to review) initiated by him. It is very unlikely this represents his full correspondence using his official NIH address.

2. The rough per-day number of emails in Jan and Feb, then May, greatly exceeds March and April.

3. A very large proportion of text with what looks to me likely to be scientific detail, in others’ comments to Fauci, has been blocked.

4. The largest proportion consists of requests to Fauci to speak either at scientific conferences or on major media television programs. Strikingly:

(a) Fauci refuses almost every invite in a medical or scientific setting
(b) Fauci accepts almost every invite to go on TV

5. The most striking feature by far, so far, is this: Fauci’s responses are utterly devoid of either scientific curiosity or depth. He shows no evidence in these pages at least, of anything but the most superficial familiarity with viral illnesses. Whenever someone proposes a helpful idea, he hands it off to a deputy to respond. He is temperate to the point of vacuity.

This came to me in a private correspondence and whether you believe or consider it is not my concern.

 

[JonDouglas]

JonDouglas, I'd love to know the source of the above disinformation. Are you willing to share it with us? Or did you just make it up?

The fact that Fauci's book was scrubbed (scrubbed means that mention of/ability to pre-order was deleted) was in all over the newswires. Once again, I have no need to furnish you with references to stuff that made all the news wires. All you had to do to check was Google "Fauci's book scrubbed". Now that I've taught you about Google, do you think you can do it yourself next tiime?

 

[Nathan]

Since we're back on the subject of Fauci and rather than hurling juvenile internet insults, I read an interesting observation by an American physicist

Glad to hear you're going to try to change your behavior. There are two things I'd like to see you do:
1. Enlighten the audience as to your motivation for your unrelenting character assassination of Dr. Fauci.
2. Try to find factual(meaning truthful, accurate)material to substantiate your claims with links, as is the custom in online communication.

 

[Nathan]

The fact that Fauci's book was scrubbed (scrubbed means that mention of/ability to pre-order was deleted) was in all over the newswires. Once again, I have no need to furnish you with references to stuff that made all the news wires. All you had to do to check was Google "Fauci's book scrubbed". Now that I've taught you about Google, do you think you can do it yourself next tiime?

Well no juvenile insults from of you in this posting, but still the arrogant, condescending attitude.
Please tell us something that is outstanding or special about you, so that we can admire you as much as you do.

 

[Becky1951]

The fact that Fauci's book was scrubbed (scrubbed means that mention of/ability to pre-order was deleted) was in all over the newswires. Once again, I have no need to furnish you with references to stuff that made all the news wires. All you had to do to check was Google "Fauci's book scrubbed". Now that I've taught you about Google, do you think you can do it yourself next tiime?

When your online reading articles its simple to copy the URL of that article and post it along with the article. It only takes a few seconds to do that. Why post information with out posting the link to it? No one would be able to doubt that the information was indeed as it was presented here.

 

[JonDouglas]

When your online reading articles its simple to copy the URL of that article and post it along with the article. It only takes a few seconds to do that. Why post information with out posting the link to it? No one would be able to doubt that the information was indeed as it was presented here.

If something is blasted all over the news media, I figure it's obvious to those who're paying attention and truly interested in the subject. If otherwise and not something private, I post the link. I am not other people's newsboy or research assistant. If or when people are truly interested, they chedk the news and/or Google the subject for themselves. My approach is one way of finding who's really interested in what you're posting and who's more of an ankle biter.