Aneeda72
Well-known Member
I suppose a way to treat both the vaccinated and unvaccinated fairly is testing; thus ending the issue of vaccinated against unvaccinated. This would only address the issue of -do you have an active case or not. Those with active spreadable cases must quarantine.
My husband works for a large company that has gone to work from home for about a year and a half. But some employees can not work from home, those are allowed to work at the nearly deserted buildings. The new policy, however, is before entrance to the building they must be tested.
They report to security/HR and are tested EVERY SINGLE DAY for Covid before they are allowed into the building. It’s the rapid test, they have to wait a half hour for the results. But this negates the vaccination issue.
What do you think? Is proof of a negative test better than proof of vaccination?
Course the problem is, as CNN recently reported, is a positive Covid test means you have Covid. But a negative Covid test, can be a false negative, and could possible mean you still have Covid.
Still, it is better than no testing.
My husband works for a large company that has gone to work from home for about a year and a half. But some employees can not work from home, those are allowed to work at the nearly deserted buildings. The new policy, however, is before entrance to the building they must be tested.
They report to security/HR and are tested EVERY SINGLE DAY for Covid before they are allowed into the building. It’s the rapid test, they have to wait a half hour for the results. But this negates the vaccination issue.
What do you think? Is proof of a negative test better than proof of vaccination?
Course the problem is, as CNN recently reported, is a positive Covid test means you have Covid. But a negative Covid test, can be a false negative, and could possible mean you still have Covid.