AnnieA
Well-known Member
- Location
- Down South
Up to a point, I agree. But, the person must also have some creds and be able to back up what they say. We must be able to separate those who contribute, discuss and are willing to engage in back and forth dialogue from those who are just shooting off their mouths or have a hidden agenda. Otherwise the discussion gets overwhelmed by static and nonsense.
IOW, we must each decide whose opinions have credibility and contribute to the discussion and separate them from those who who speak from ignorance or have different agendas. This is not unusual. Anybody who has been on a jury knows that one job of the jurors is to decide which witnesses they can believe and trust. And which ones they won't. It's not always easy.
There are certainly a few here who are regurgitating what they hear on whichever of the two polarized news camps they've chosen to believe hook line and sinker. Those are easy to dismiss and are few, thankfully.
Then there's the more prevalent group who occasionally think outside their ideological frame work, and I enjoy reading and discussing their posts at times.
Harder to find are those who want to question and research outside the 'go team' two...and only TWO.... sides of Western news media.
.