Em in Ohio said:
Do I believe in things that
haven't yet been proven scientifically to my satisfaction? No.
But I believe in some things based on my own experiences that scientists continue to explore.
I see a distinction between the supernatural and the mythological.
Supernatural: "of a manifestation or event) attributed to some force beyond scientific understanding or the laws of nature." I see these as "natural plus." But I limit that to things like precognition, extra-sensory perception, and some manifestations. These are things (sensitivities, abilities) some humans are endowed with (or gifted with, if you prefer.)
I am more skeptical of many things that fall more under the category of the paranormal (almost synonymous, but...) That isn't to say that I think they are all false, just that I personally would need more scientific proof or personal experience. To me, this includes miracles, ghosts, past-lives.
A mythology is a collection of traditional stories about characters such as deities, (super)heroes, and fanciful creatures. These to me are stories with little or no basis in facts. I consider them fanciful exaggerations, at best. These are passed down from generation to generation and they travel via word-of-mouth to distant places with names and locations changed. They get translated and retranslated. They evolve with the circumstances of the times. (Think of these as the childhood game of telephone, where numerous kids sit in a circle and one whispers a message to the next, until they all hear "it." But inevitably, the last child's version rarely has much resemblance to the original.)
I don't know what L.E. means and I know nothing of Qi Gong Masters, but I admire you greatly for your openness to explore other beliefs!