Police can not do that over here!Quite recently, for a random breath test.
Another Australian program that saves lives. Before RBT there were too many drunks behind the wheel. We also have random roadside drug testing too but I've never been stopped for this test.Police can not do that over here!
We have fixed/predermined sobriety checkpoints. Our 4th Amendment does not permit selective random enforcement.Another Australian program that saves lives. Before RBT there were too many drunks behind the wheel. We also have random roadside drug testing too but I've never been stopped for this test.
This driver was what cops call a "frequent flyer " meaning he wasn't learning from his previous charges and convictions. Lets remember this all happened in Canada, not the USA. Here we enforce traffic laws evenly, and having "money " isn't a way to avoid punishment. A recent case here where a 22 year old driver killed a woman and her three kids , while speeding and driving drunk, resulted in a 17 year prison sentence for the driver. JimB.Did he ever hurt anyone or cause extensive property damage ?
I ask because too often someone hits and kills someone, or causes thousands of dollars in damage, and gets of scot-free because .... they had enough money or something ?
Actually they can do a roadside breath test, provided they have "reasonable and probable grounds to believe that you MAY be impaired by alcohol OR drugs ". Those are based on observations while you were driving, then how you answer questions after being stopped, your physical appearance, speech, and ability to perform physical tests. The process is a number of steps, that taken together results in the officer forming the conclusion that you are impaired. The breath test is done twice. Once at the roadside, and again at the station. The two readings are compared to see how much alcohol you have in your blood stream. In other countries, it is standard procedure to breath test EVERY driver that is stopped for ANY reason. That gets the possibility of alcohol consumption off the table, at the start of the traffic stop. JimB.Police can not do that over here!
I did not say roadside breath tests were not permissable, just not a pick and choose random stop type as WG outlined.Actually they can do a roadside breath test, provided they have "reasonable and probable grounds to believe that you MAY be impaired by alcohol OR drugs ". Those are based on observations while you were driving, then how you answer questions after being stopped, your physical appearance, speech, and ability to perform physical tests. The process is a number of steps, that taken together results in the officer forming the conclusion that you are impaired. The breath test is done twice. Once at the roadside, and again at the station. The two readings are compared to see how much alcohol you have in your blood stream. In other countries, it is standard procedure to breath test EVERY driver that is stopped for ANY reason. That gets the possibility of alcohol consumption off the table, at the start of the traffic stop. JimB.
(deleted)