10 Year Old Victim Denied Treatment in Ohio

Strange way to treat child victims of abuse in the
mightiest Country in the World!

Sickening really, the cause of the situation and, the
"we couldn't care less", attitude of the, "powers That Be",
who have abandoned this child.

https://metro.co.uk/2022/07/03/us-r...-in-ohio-after-supreme-court-ruling-16933422/

Mike.
I got as far as the poster.
MAYBE, if instead of all this about 'choice,' situations like that were presented as 'helping a crime victim,' things would be different.
 
I couldn't believe when the governor of my state signed that law into effect. My state is Ohio . He seemed to jump right up quick and do it. He hasn't a clue what it's like to be a woman let alone a pregnant one!
 
And back in April 2022, here is the female GOP rep who introduced this bill. Pls remember, this case arose because the child had been placed with Child Protective Services:

Ohio lawmaker calls pregnancies from rape an ‘opportunity’ for victims
Washington Post 29April2022
(excerpts, subscriber-only access)

An Ohio lawmaker proposing a near-total abortion ban was given a hypothetical: [If] A 13-year-old girl is raped and becomes pregnant as a result. Would the Republican’s bill force that teenager to have her rapist’s baby?

Yes — and the resulting child would be an “opportunity,” stated Rep. Jean Schmidt said this week. “It is a shame that it happens, but there’s an opportunity for that woman, no matter how young or old she is, to make a determination about what she’s going to do to help that life be a productive human being,” she said.

Schmidt made the comment while testifying Wednesday before a committee about her legislation, House Bill 598, which would ban abortions, except those needed to end life-threatening pregnancies. Schmidt’s bill is part of a wave of antiabortion legislation cropping up in Republican-controlled statehouses across the country as conservatives anticipate a Supreme Court decision that would overturn or weaken Roe v. Wade — an increasingly likely prospect as the court, with its 6-3 conservative majority, considers a case about Mississippi’s 15-week abortion ban, The Washington Post reported.

... Her testimony before Ohio’s House Government Oversight Committee remained collegial through most of Wednesday’s hearing, although lawmakers’ passions flared while discussing her bill’s lack of a rape exception. Her colleague Rep. Richard Brown (D) started the discussion by proposing the hypothetical example of a 13-year-old girl impregnated by a rapist and giving his interpretation of Schmidt’s legislation: It would require that teenager to carry a “felon’s fetus” to term, no matter the emotional or psychological trauma that would cause her.

“Is that right?” Brown asked.

“Rape is a difficult issue, and it emotionally scars the individual … for the rest of their life, just as child abuse does,” Schmidt replied. “But if a baby is created, it is a human life, and, whether that mother ends that pregnancy or not, the scars will not go away — period.”

Schmidt’s answer did not satisfy Brown. “I think this girl has rights, every bit as much as this zygote has rights under your bill. This girl has rights, and I don’t believe we can lose sight of the rights of the person who was raped.”
 
I am a super Liberal, but I can understand how some rightly can think of abortion as murder. And as a super Liberal, I can understand a woman's right over her body. Which is "right"? SCOTUS's throwing it back to the states solves that problem for a time. It's a way to be yes and no at the same time. Take the 10-year-old to another state.
 
I am a super Liberal, but I can understand how some rightly can think of abortion as murder. And as a super Liberal, I can understand a woman's right over her body. Which is "right"? SCOTUS's throwing it back to the states solves that problem for a time. It's a way to be yes and no at the same time. Take the 10-year-old to another state.
As I've said before, on ANY topic states already have too many rights. A person's quality of life should not depend on where he or she lives.

Also, "throwing it back to the states" is a good example of "passing the buck"- like "let somebody else take the responsibility of making the decisions."
 
I am a super Liberal, but I can understand how some rightly can think of abortion as murder. And as a super Liberal, I can understand a woman's right over her body. Which is "right"? SCOTUS's throwing it back to the states solves that problem for a time. It's a way to be yes and no at the same time. Take the 10-year-old to another state.
I wonder what the reasoning is for the individual states to get to decide. I thought this was all supposed to be one country,
e pluribus unum and all that.
 
I think states were squabbling during the writing of the constitution and did not want to give up power, so to get them onboard, they invented states rights as a compromise. This included the electoral college which allowed states to have a bigger say over electing the president too. And until recently, if the president won the popular majority, he would win the election, but in high school I learned, it was possible this may not always be the case, and this fluke has installed the last two Republican presidents. This was also an effort to give individual states more power.

It never made sense to me, and doesn't today, but of course Republicans like it, because they can win the presidency without a majority. It only makes sense to the minority, and I suppose to some legal scholars. But, it's not a matter of whether it makes sense. It's more like you either understand it or you don't. When President Bush won the presidency without a popular majority, my Republican friends were quit to point out that we don't live in a democracy. We live in a Republic. And of course that's true, but we like to call our government democratic, because anything else wouldn't sound as fair.
 
There are pregnancy services everywhere. What I understand is that they will remain open to assist girls and women in these situations. They educate and help them with options available.
 


Back
Top