\The problem for him is getting the big donors who may have already committed to the Clinton money machine...
Yup, but I don't see it happening either. The system has been totally corrupted, but the public doesn't seem concerned enough to do much about it yet...
Here's an in depth profile of Jim Webb written back in 2008 by Elizabeth Drew a political writer I respect. I don't know how much seven years may have changed things, I'm inclined to think not all that much because Webb is a very principled man. Not on the surface a consummate politician. I find it hard to see that he has the political savvy to put together a winning campaign.
http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2008/jun/26/the-jim-webb-story/
That people don't know him could be a good thing, a fresh face maybe ...
That people don't know him could be a good thing, a fresh face maybe ...
If he can be a viable debate opponent to Hillary and pull her a bit more to the left, I am all for him running. But it is doubtful he can beat her.
First off I will vote against GOP! I wish Webb could muster the votes to take the Dem nomination but he is fighting a huge machine that's been getting bigger and better for years. I like Clinton but I worry about the trumped up baggage she is and will be confronted with. I do think we should give a woman a shot at the oval office and if women helped her get elected we would have a woman President, but women will not support a woman in the numbers required for one to win.
Are you saying women would support a man over a woman all others factors being equal?
Are you saying women would support a man over a woman all others factors being equal?