Musk polls Twitter users on whether he should be CEO

Status
Not open for further replies.

Nathan

SF VIP
Musk polls Twitter users on whether he should be CEO—57.5% want him to quit.

Elon Musk polled Twitter users yesterday on whether he should remain as the company's CEO and claimed he would abide by the results. The poll concluded with 17.5 million votes, with a large majority urging Musk to step down.

"Should I step down as head of Twitter? I will abide by the results of this poll," Musk wrote. The "Yes" option was selected by 57.5 percent of poll respondents.

Musk hasn't confirmed whether he will actually step down. "The question is not finding a CEO, the question is finding a CEO who can keep Twitter alive," Musk wrote last night after posting the poll. "No one wants the job who can actually keep Twitter alive. There is no successor," he also wrote in response to a tweet speculating that he "already has the new CEO picked out."

Even if Musk does cede the CEO title, he would still be in charge as the owner of Twitter. Musk has said in the past that "CEO is a made-up title" and doesn't "mean anything." He has called himself the "Technoking" of Tesla and "Chief Twit" at Twitter, but officially is the CEO of both of those companies and SpaceX.
Musk has also previously said he intends to eventually give up the top spot at Twitter. "I expect to reduce my time at Twitter and find somebody else to run Twitter over time," Musk said last month in testimony during a trial over his pay at Tesla.

Meanwhile, Musk wrote yesterday that Twitter will rely on polls for major policy changes in the future. Over the weekend, Twitter implemented but then quickly deleted a policy that banned links to other social media platforms such as Facebook, Instagram, Mastodon, and Truth Social.

"At both the Tweet level and the account level, we will remove any free promotion of prohibited 3rd-party social media platforms, such as linking out (i.e. using URLs) to any of the below platforms on Twitter, or providing your handle without a URL," the now-deleted policy says. The policy also said that accounts "used for the main purpose of promoting content on another social platform may be suspended."

"Going forward, there will be a vote for major policy changes. My apologies. Won't happen again," Musk wrote.

The official Twitter Safety account announced the ban on social media links in a series of tweets yesterday, but those tweets were deleted. Shortly after Musk promised to hold votes on major policy changes, the Twitter Safety account posted a poll asking whether Twitter should "have a policy preventing the creation of or use of existing accounts for the main purpose of advertising other social media platforms." The poll runs for 24 hours and ends tonight.
arstechnica.
 

A $44billion dollar company and he has anyone voting for the CEO position. Maybe he thought he was more popular. Since he owns the company, nothing except a different figurehead may take over.
 
Musk polls Twitter users on whether he should be CEO—57.5% want him to quit.

Elon Musk polled Twitter users yesterday on whether he should remain as the company's CEO and claimed he would abide by the results. The poll concluded with 17.5 million votes, with a large majority urging Musk to step down.

"Should I step down as head of Twitter? I will abide by the results of this poll," Musk wrote. The "Yes" option was selected by 57.5 percent of poll respondents.

Musk hasn't confirmed whether he will actually step down. "The question is not finding a CEO, the question is finding a CEO who can keep Twitter alive," Musk wrote last night after posting the poll. "No one wants the job who can actually keep Twitter alive. There is no successor," he also wrote in response to a tweet speculating that he "already has the new CEO picked out."

Even if Musk does cede the CEO title, he would still be in charge as the owner of Twitter. Musk has said in the past that "CEO is a made-up title" and doesn't "mean anything." He has called himself the "Technoking" of Tesla and "Chief Twit" at Twitter, but officially is the CEO of both of those companies and SpaceX.
Musk has also previously said he intends to eventually give up the top spot at Twitter. "I expect to reduce my time at Twitter and find somebody else to run Twitter over time," Musk said last month in testimony during a trial over his pay at Tesla.

Meanwhile, Musk wrote yesterday that Twitter will rely on polls for major policy changes in the future. Over the weekend, Twitter implemented but then quickly deleted a policy that banned links to other social media platforms such as Facebook, Instagram, Mastodon, and Truth Social.

"At both the Tweet level and the account level, we will remove any free promotion of prohibited 3rd-party social media platforms, such as linking out (i.e. using URLs) to any of the below platforms on Twitter, or providing your handle without a URL," the now-deleted policy says. The policy also said that accounts "used for the main purpose of promoting content on another social platform may be suspended."

"Going forward, there will be a vote for major policy changes. My apologies. Won't happen again," Musk wrote.

The official Twitter Safety account announced the ban on social media links in a series of tweets yesterday, but those tweets were deleted. Shortly after Musk promised to hold votes on major policy changes, the Twitter Safety account posted a poll asking whether Twitter should "have a policy preventing the creation of or use of existing accounts for the main purpose of advertising other social media platforms." The poll runs for 24 hours and ends tonight.
arstechnica.
Smoke and mirrors.
 
Clever PR move I suppose. I really don’t get the Twitter thing myself but….
 
Last edited:
I am pretty sure that this poll was just another bot-finding mission, just like the poll about reinstating President Trump was for. Until he ran the poll and was able to verify between actual people and bots, they would not be able to say, which is probably why the accounts that mention the survey results do not mention about finding bots.

If he is going to step down, then he probably has already thought about who he would put in charge. I think that it really shook him up bad when his little boy was attacked by liberal protesters last week. They tracked his vehicle and attacked it, thinking that Elon Musk was in the car, but it was his young child who was in the vehicle.
Something like this would be enough to really worry any parent, and obviously, the protesters didn’t care who was in the car.
 
Elon, I believe, is far far less flaky than he'd like people to believe......gives him a distinct edge in negotiations when he's playing a whole different game than his opposition.
I didn't say he was flaky, I said he was a bit of a nutter which I believe he is.
 
I don't know what to believe about this. It makes me wonder if he has aspirations in politics in his future? :unsure:
I've wondered the same thing. I'm sure he's good at making lots of money. Probably most politicians have that side of them, but it's not the thing a look for in a president. I've only seen him in real time once, and that was on Saturday Night Live. He was the worst host I have ever seen. He had no stage presence whatsoever and seemed like he didn't have a clue what he was doing. That was the first time I ever had a negative thought about him. Most of the time, I don't think about him. He's just not worth my time.
 
I've wondered the same thing. I'm sure he's good at making lots of money. Probably most politicians have that side of them, but it's not the thing a look for in a president. I've only seen him in real time once, and that was on Saturday Night Live. He was the worst host I have ever seen. He had no stage presence whatsoever and seemed like he didn't have a clue what he was doing. That was the first time I ever had a negative thought about him. Most of the time, I don't think about him. He's just not worth my time.
Me neither but this scuttlebutt has been circulating.
 
I've wondered the same thing. I'm sure he's good at making lots of money. Probably most politicians have that side of them, but it's not the thing a look for in a president. I've only seen him in real time once, and that was on Saturday Night Live. He was the worst host I have ever seen. He had no stage presence whatsoever and seemed like he didn't have a clue what he was doing. That was the first time I ever had a negative thought about him. Most of the time, I don't think about him. He's just not worth my time.
People who are born with disabilities did not ask to be born that way, and ridiculing someone because they have autism seems like a pretty uncaring way to feel about someone.
Not a lot of people with autism, or other disabilities are able to manage their life the way that Elon Musk has done, especially after the confusion and ridicule he suffered when he was growing up.

As far as Musk only being interested in money, I do not think that is accurate either. Even though he is unable to express himself well, especially publicly, because of his autism; he seems to show that he cares about humanity and for this world as a whole.
In fact, most of the disabled people whom I have known had some of the biggest hearts and concern for people that I have seen.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top