Man Accused of Shooting a Girl and Her Parents

He didn't even live in the neighborhood. His girlfriend moved him in, and she was renting out a bedroom in a guy's home. Sue the landlord here. I'm not kidding, the young man who owned the home is culpable in a lawsuit.
 
Pepper said:
He didn't even live in the neighborhood. His girlfriend moved him in, and she was renting out a bedroom in a guy's home. Sue the landlord here. I'm not kidding, the young man who owned the home is culpable in a lawsuit.
Click to expand...
earlier they said ( I posted this here on the forum earlier today).. that this guy moved in just a short time ago, and since day one has had a problem with children playing outside, so it was only a matter of time before he exploded. Also he apparently attacked a previous g/f with a sledgehammer
 

The world has gone mad!! I'm glad he was apprehended and hope he gets the punishment he deserves! This was the 4th case in a week of people getting shot while doing normal, everyday things.
~Cheerleader shot when accidentally getting into the wrong car in a parking lot. Thankfully she wasn't killed and is recovering in the hospital.
~Of course there is already a thread about the 16 year old who was shot in the head when going to the wrong house to pick up his siblings. Thank God he also survived and is home.
~There is also a thread about the woman who pulled into the wrong driveway and was shot and killed.

I don't see that gun violence was anywhere near necessary in any of these cases. There are no excuses for any of it. And how come that old man who shot that boy was released?! It will be interesting to see how each of these cases are handled by the judicial system.
 
Pepper said:
He didn't even live in the neighborhood. His girlfriend moved him in, and she was renting out a bedroom in a guy's home. Sue the landlord here. I'm not kidding, the young man who owned the home is culpable in a lawsuit.
Click to expand...
We rented out a house that we owned for a few years and only came by if they had a problem with something at the house. If our tenant decided to shoot someone, why would we get sued? It's not like the shooter informed us ahead of time about what he was going to do. How would we be responsible for his actions?
 
caroln said:
We rented out a house that we owned for a few years and only came by if they had a problem with something at the house. If our tenant decided to shoot someone, why would we get sued? It's not like the shooter informed us ahead of time about what he was going to do. How would we be responsible for his actions?
Click to expand...
This landlord lived in the home, approved his tenant renting a room within his living space and then approved her boyfriend moving in. You were an absentee landlord, a different situation entirely; but yes, you might be sued anyway in such an event because a suit like this requires the widest net spread possible.
 
Pepper said:
This landlord lived in the home, approved his tenant renting a room within his living space and then approved her boyfriend moving in. You were an absentee landlord, a different situation entirely; but yes, you might be sued anyway in such an event because a suit like this requires the widest net spread possible.
Click to expand...

"because a suit like this requires the widest net spread possible."

Sure , don't just go after the person responsible , sue all that you think you have a right too. Make just as much money as you can.

It's no wonder so much of the world hates America.
 
caroln said:
We rented out a house that we owned for a few years and only came by if they had a problem with something at the house. If our tenant decided to shoot someone, why would we get sued? It's not like the shooter informed us ahead of time about what he was going to do. How would we be responsible for his actions?
Click to expand...

Because the malingering dog that sub-rents a room likely doesn't have anything to his name. The landlord might actually have some money.

Might as well go for some free money ....... <sarc>
 
I suppose you're going to criticize a guy for "standing his ground". After being attacked by a vicious basketball, the 6 year old attacker entered the guy's property, and "fearing for his life", the guy shot the vile attacker only to protect his life. When the attacker's accomplice, her father, entered the property, the guy "feared for his life", and shot him.
All I can say is thank God for the North Carolina gun culture that allowed a convicted felon to get his hands on a gun, which as a 'responsible' gun owner used his weapon only to protect his life.
 
I knew a fellow that rented out a room in his oversized home and the man that rented the room was responsible for mowing the grass as part of his rent. The renter decided to mow over a bunch of the neighbor’s flowers just to be a jerk and the neighbor sued the man and the owner. The company that insured the man’s home refused to pay the claim or enter into helping with litigation expenses like most homeowners’ poloices will do because the owner did not report he had a renter in his home. The judge in small claims court ruled that the owner was responsible for the mower’s actions and adjudicated the case in favor of the claimant. He ordered the owner to pay (I think) around $75 for the flowers, plus $100 in punitive damages for the labor of planting the bulbs and $150 for a doctor’s visit because the lady became distressed over losing her flowers, plus the neighbor’s attorney fees. The owner represented himself. Justice was served.

The owner of the house was bragging about how he was going to win this case hands down and the judge would make a fool out of her. Unfortunately for him, the judge was also a flower lover and planted a lot of expensive flowers around his home. The owner asked me what did I think was going to happen. I told him he better take his checkbook along to court. He laughed at me. Guess who had the last laugh? I later found out that the judge was known for his prize winning roses and Irises.
 
Pepper said:
He didn't even live in the neighborhood. His girlfriend moved him in, and she was renting out a bedroom in a guy's home. Sue the landlord here. I'm not kidding, the young man who owned the home is culpable in a lawsuit.
Click to expand...
That would be State specific and it would have to be a proper Joinder. Joining a defendant that is not liable by law, will only get them dismissed. A Real Estate Attorney would know about Premises liability law and naming proper defendants.
 
does the opportunity to acquire guns legally [under 21 yrs old] define what ' a civilized country' is all about ? even if you have never been diagnosed as 'crazy' you still probably feel better carrying at least one in your car for your own survival { and of course in some states are required by law to do so I understand. I used to enjoy watching the 'cowboy' films every saturday arvo as a kid and guess what I would come out of the cinema waving imaginary guns and shooting them as I persuade my mates in an effort to gun them down. Even we as young kids were being taught to love guns and use imaginary ones whenever for sport and relaxation. Mr Da had to use one in the WWII and said it was never fun son to go and shoot a man
 

You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top