As with other Christian religious threads, I strongly disagree with what some anti-religious members post but rarely bother to respond beyond briefly even though I could because there is usually little point in doing so beyond understanding how others feel about subjects. There are some strong arguments against the existence of any supernatural beings including gods. And also some excellent arguments for the existence of a powerful force in nature whether supernatural or vastly more advanced. Large libraries are filled with books on these subjects that a feeble web discussion can't adequately address.
Community web forum discussions are poor places for productive religious discussions. Some anti-religious members will repeatably cherry pick warring sections of the Bible as though it was actually written by God (instead of ancient ruler's scribes with an agenda), ancient Bible sections that don't conform to recent Western morality like modern law and gender issues. Or anti-science actions of some limited denomination (usually young Earth Baptists), or something immoral or unethical a prominent church goer was hypocritically caught doing, or rant about why didn't God do something about what some small minority of pedaphile pervert priests or preachers secretly did [not His responsibility.], or how in the name of the church some ruler then warred against innocent others as with the Crusades, or why doesn't a loving God help the poor, abused, and weak, why is there so much evil in God's world if he made it [He didn't.], or why didn't God save my little dog Alphie after I prayed, or how could <species name> have developed purely by evolution, or why doesn't God simply show himself so we can believe, and a long list of others that were written by men, but blamed on God [Because he never responds to direct Earth monkey questions.]. (Despite the inerrant inspired nonsense.) Religious authorities are of course very guilty of bringing many of these criticisms on themselves because of their own long history of manipulative agendas and creative statements claiming to be led by God [God is laughing at that.].
Of course apologetists have reasonable arguments for addressing or understanding the above. Anyone can now easily read about them with a mouse click. But on a web board, it it easy for members to repeat any of the above as though they are still open questions requiring additional debate. With the WWW there are enormous resources on the web for these subjects and I would suggest starting with the balanced views of Wikipedia that provides lots of links for deeper resources. Most of the time people just post the above to emotionally bait others into needless discussion because they know many just cannot resist being dragged into their cat turd flavored sandbox.
