Sorry, I can't read Washington Post (it's behind a paywall). I would have read the article otherwise......
The CBS News link says "Still waiting on Google Docs, trying again" , and it never loads. The story talks about a single incident, with no wider context. Still, if you take in, oh I don't know, 250,000 desperate people, there's bound to be a percentage of nefarious individuals. That doesn't cast the entire number as bad. I also did some research into the homeless situation in San Fran, and as I noted earlier, none of them gave Immigration as the primary cause.
I would add that jobs taken by illegals are jobs lost to the poorer elements of society, who then turn to crime.
Seriously? So you claim poor people are turning to crime because immigrants take their minimum wage jobs? Seriously? Perhaps we just need to lock up all the poor people? If there is a job going, then only one person can take it. Fair enough. But I'm just not seeing how this is a major issue - poor people being cheated out of their $18 an hour because an illegal immigrant got their first? A lot has got to happen to make that occur.
Keep in mind, hiring an illegal immigrant could be stopped immediately if employers enforced the law. They don't, because they're probably not even making the $18 an hour........ As a potential employer, you can choose not to hire illegal candidates. Though I am concerned about restaurants around the world.
Oh really? All of Trumps laws and orders? I won't introduce politics into this discussion, even though your claims would be easily shattered , but how is the wall building coming along?
Directly talking about candidates is verboten here, so neither you nor I can discuss it in any detail. The wall, imo, is and was the dumbest suggestion I've heard regarding immigration. The idea of putting up a 3000 mile long wall to keep people out - while at the same time, I might add, keeps YOU IN - is preposterous. It will never be built, because it's 2023, and if the US thinks it can go to war with China, then it surely can monitor a border, as it has done, for hundreds of years.
The current administration did make some changes to immigration policy, such as making sure kids aren't separated from their parents, and are reunited when it has taken place. But the often proclaimed "the border is wide open" is completely untrue. The fact remains, most illegal immigrants come across the official borders. All the same checks along the border are still in place.
Think of it this way - drugs are the bane of society. So surely, we should stop illegal drugs from entering the country? Except - it's impossible. It's a task that can only be achieved a (relatively) small percent of the time. The streets from East to West are chock full of drugs. Yet it's against the law to bring them in, and the US has spend $1 trillion dollars over 50 years or so fighting back. It's like water, it flows around all that gets in its way. Some problems can't be reduced to 0.
As you well know, those immigrants who make it in and are given orders to return and appear before a judge simply disappear or go to a sanctuary city or state and ignore the order to appear. Nothing legal about that.
But we're not talking legality here, no-one has questioned that the people in question are illegal. When they enter the country they are given a stamp in their passport with a date on it. Or they're handed a letter to that regard. They're then let free to wander. They will congregate, I assume, where others like themselves are.
As mentioned earlier, illegal immigrants working has been a mainstay in Texas since forever. No-one cared about it, no-one freaked out. In fact, when I lived there, I sometimes wondered if day-to-day living was even possible without the contributions of the hard working people I saw and met.
Further, I'm not saying there isn't a problem, and that a solution is required. I've just not read of any sensible way for it to be handled. In the UK we're talking about sending applicants to Rwanda to be processed. We currently have a boat we're dumping them on. It's not feasible as a policy long term. I maintain that unless we tackle the problem at its root, it'll never be resolved. Rational thinking is shockingly rare on the topic because it's been weaponized.
Regardless, I don't think this is the answer:
