Debrah N.
Senior Member
- Location
- Alberta, Canada
Catastrophic if we do nothing is what I meant as well as we shouldn't take a chance on setting timelines because that's always a mistake. And unfortunately, while some politicians are trying to make some changes and investing in technology, they're still at the whim of the voters, many of whom are terrified of change even when it's needed.No, there are real scientists who argue that the word "catastrophic" highly overstates the effect of a slight increase in global temperatures. They aren't saying there will be zero effects; they agree that an increase in global temperatures will cause changes, and those changes will cause problems. But they are quite certain those problems are not insurmountable because we are capable of overcoming them through technologies, i.e., agricultural, marine, economic, meteorological, geological, etc
Take Canada. We have a PM who is trying to facilitate a transition in our country and as a result of doing some of those changes and investments and programs, he's possibly going to lose at the next election and the party that would likely take over, actually took a vote inside their party that climate change isn't real. And to date, they have no environmental plan, just a vague assurance that 'technology' is the answer, even as they demand cuts in spending, pump more oil, etc.
What do you think will happen to the environmental programs that Canada's current government is trying to push forward if that party change happens? And having scientists who aren't speaking with more urgency, is fodder for not bothering too much when we need to be getting on this. That's human nature, put it off today and we'll get right on that.....sometime. It's like they think they can slow and turn around the ocean liner on a dime instead of admitting that we need to be getting on this now, without wasting time.