My other forum attended, FWIW, surprised me in several new ways, few of which were admirable. Perhaps folks here will "clue" me early on, of similarities existing with this one. (I am currently "banned" from the other!).
Moderators there are for the most part, also Seniors, like myself, the most, let's say, "notorious" one, being a retired u.S. Navy Big Brass type: accustomed to being in charge, resisting others who fail to "obey", in other words, far from impartial. OK, that I can live with. Rules must be accepted BY ALL, right? Then, over time, come to find that much "double-standard" favoritism is played, between Moderator and "pets". OK, that I can also live with. Then, come to learn, the forum solicits donations from it's members, voluntary, of course! Next, the most disagreeable, sour, alienated member, disliked with no hidden certainty, is purportedly a heavy contributor to the forum! Getting the picture?
It's run like a political "machine"! OK, then, I can even live with that, though after being a member of quite a few forums, and fairly "sure of myself", (ha, that's a laugh!), I could see that definite patterns exist in most forums, where "group" friendships develop as a natural consequence of the very concept of forum-membership, thus creating what I called "cliques" devoted to certain topics. BAD choice of comparative words! For using "clique" to describe our group of 10 or so, I was miserably berated; why, I still cannot fathom. My response, which went unanswered, was, should I have rather used the word, "fold"?
Now, having endured my initiation "right" of introduction here, do similarities to what I described above, exist here, to any degree?
Thanks for persevering through this diatribe of mine! imp