Denver gave people experiencing homelessness $1,000 a month.

Paco Dennis

SF VIP
Location
Mid-Missouri

A year later, nearly half of participants had housing.


Jarun Laws lived in his car in a restaurant parking lot near downtown Denver. He worked there as a cook until 2020, and had only $400 a month left after paying bills and child support. That was barely enough to cover his car payments and child support — and not even close to what he would need for rent.

The 51-year-old occasionally spent part of his paycheck on weekend stays at a cheap hotel, where he could spend time with his children. He struggled to afford food, clothes, and medicine — and he had been experiencing homelessness for nearly a decade.

That changed when Laws enrolled in The Denver Basic Income Project. The pilot program allowed Laws to secure a temporary apartment with furniture, spend more time with his children, and find a better-paying job.

"I had questioned myself: if I was going to be a good father to my children because I was suffering," Laws previously told Business Insider. "When I got accepted, it changed my life."

Denver's basic income pilot — which first started payments in fall 2022 — focused on over 800 Coloradans experiencing homelessness, including people living in cars, temporary shelters, the outdoors, or other non-fixed living situations. Participants like Laws were given direct cash payments, no strings attached, and could spend the money on whatever they needed.

Denver released the project's one-year report on June 18, showing that 45% of participants secured their own house or apartment after receiving basic income for 10 months. They also experienced fewer emergency room visits, nights spent in a hospital or a temporary shelter, and jail stays. The report estimates that this reduction in public service use saved the city $589,214.

Denver's program initially lasted one year and was extended in January for another six months. Participants were sorted into random groups: one received $1,000 a month for a year; another got $6,500 upfront, followed by $500 a month; and a third got $50 a month as a control group.

The city of Denver, the Colorado Trust, and an anonymous foundation funded the project and has already provided more than $9.4 million to participants.

Basic income programs like Denver's have become a popular strategy to reduce poverty in US cities. Compared to traditional social services like SNAP or Medicaid, basic income allows participants to spend the money where they need it most.

"What is fundamentally different about our approach is the way that we start from a place of trust," Mark Donovan, the project founder and executive director, said at a Tuesday press conference.

Denver's basic income project helped participants secure housing and jobs

Denver's report found that basic income primarily helped participants pay for immediate expenses — like transportation, hygiene, clothes, and groceries. Affording recurring bills like rent, healthcare, or debt payments was also a top priority for most families. Participants in each payment group reported increased financial stability and reduced reliance on emergency financial assistance programs.

Basic income puts low-income families on "an equal playing field," Nick Pacheco, participant engagement coordinator, said at a press conference. He said the cash payments also help participants get the training and resources they need to establish careers.

Individuals who received the lump sum or $1,000 a month payments were more likely to find a stable, full-time job than before they received basic income.

"It's freedom," Pacheco said. "It's freedom from poverty and not being able to reach your goals."

Participating households also experienced improved mental health and could spend more time with family and friends. Parents were able to better support their children and grandchildren.

These results echo those from the six-month report, which found fewer participants were sleeping on the street, experiencing food insecurity, and feeling unsafe.

Still, participants' financial outcomes varied based on their payment group. Participants who received the lump sum $6,500 payment in addition to $500 a month could better build savings and make major life changes like signing a new lease or buying a car.

Many families told researchers that they're anxious about paying bills after the basic income payments end. Some worry they could lose their housing again.

Laws, for example, had to go back to living in his car after his payments stopped.

Being able to pay bills alleviated participants' financial stress

Denver participants have told BI that basic income was the financial safety net they needed.

Moriah Rodriguez, 38, was working as a youth developer for Denver Public Schools when she got hit by a car and suffered a traumatic brain injury. She lived in public housing with her kids, all of whom have intellectual disabilities, though they were displaced shortly after.

She received monthly Social Security payments, just enough to care for her kids. While staying with a friend, she learned about the pilot program.

Rodriguez used the payments to fix her truck, transport her kids to school and work, buy new clothing, and secure a lifelong public housing voucher. She also used some of the money to pay $400 for rent, $500 on gas, $100 on hygiene, and $100 on her credit card bill. In addition to returning to school to get her GED, she brought her credit score into the 700s.

"The program gave me more time to focus on their education and their mental health," Rodriguez said, referring to her children, and added that the program's extension was another lifeline. "I had the space to get them tested and get them diagnosed and connected with the support they need."

Similarly, Dia Broncucia, 53, and Justin Searls, 45, could also afford essentials like an apartment, a new car, and mental health resources through basic income. They had previously lived in a temporary shelter but could secure a studio apartment for $1,300 a month, along with clothing, hygiene products, and furniture.

Broncucia and Searls said last October that though they had some uncertainties about their future, they felt much stronger and less stressed because of basic income.

"Starting with nothing and then being able to receive a lump sum of money and then get our payments once a month is why we were able to get on track and stay on track," Broncucia previously told BI.

Basic income pilots can provide poverty solutions

As the basic income pilot continues to be successful in cities like Denver, local leaders and economic security experts are looking to translate pilots into policy. States like California and New Mexico are already proposing basic income programs in the state legislature.

"The lessons from those pilots are infusing the whole ecosystem of support," Teri Olle, director for Economic Security California, a branch of the nonprofit Economic Security Project, previously told BI. "People are really seeing the power of those pilots, and the power of giving people money and trusting them."

Denver leaders also hope to extend the city's basic income for a third year. The project is currently raising the millions of dollars necessary to continue efforts in Colorado.

Donovan said he's paying close attention to results from basic income programs across the country. It's a "really exciting time in the movement," he said.

"If we're able to move people into housing and out of homelessness at a lower cost and generate better long-term outcomes, why wouldn't we try to expand and build upon that?" Donovan said.


Denver gave people experiencing homelessness $1,000 a month. A year later, nearly half of participants had housing.
 

I think all homeless have an image of being mentally ill, shiftless, dangerous, and alcoholic druggies. Yet, most people are just a few missed paychecks away from being homeless. Rather than homelessness being retribution for some kind of moral degeneration, homelessness may be more economic circumstances.
An estimated 67% of homeless are mentally ill. Mental illness is not moral degeneration, it's illness just like diabetes and heart disease are illnesses.

I'm glad Denver is trying to do something for all these people and I hope they are getting medical help and medication as well.
 
What a great story! We were in Denver recently and it is a beautiful city. It isn't even in the Top 10 in homelessness around the country but they still found something to help improve their situation. Other major cities might want to look to them as an example.

Cities with the largest homeless populations in 2023​

Among 49 major-city Continuums of Care
A table of the top major US cities by homeless population
Table with 2 columns and 10 rows.
CityHomeless population 2023
1New York City88,025
2Los Angeles City & County71,320
3Seattle/King County14,149
4San Diego City and County10,264
5Metropolitan Denver10,054
6San Jose/Santa Clara City & County9,903
7Oakland, Berkeley/Alameda County9,759
8Phoenix, Mesa/Maricopa County9,642
9Sacramento City & County9,281
10San Francisco7,582
 
As radical as this idea sounds, I do like the idea and it's a good thing that at least once city thought "outside the box". Many homeless people are just a paycheck or two away from not being homeless and hopefully this will help more people become aware of that. And yes, the homeless do cost taxpayers but there are homeless who do work and pay taxes also.
 
Years ago they tried a similar Basic Income program in Winnipeg in Canada and more recently, I think Ontario had a similar trial program going. I think they only gave working poor folks something like $500 a month and it was successful in that it gave people a little relief from continual panic at not being able to pay rent, buy healthy food or whatever and a few folks had just enough money then to take a shot at starting some little business of their own or taking some sort of upgrading courses and not having to fear being short on rent during their effort. But when the new provincial government came in, they cancelled it. Short sighted and cold hearted.
 
I don't understand how the Basic Income Program differs from Social Services and aid for dependent children (welfare and AFDC). You get your check every month and there's no rules about how you can spend the money. Both programs also make you automatically eligible for low-cost rentals. AFDC includes free medical services and a food allowance. Some SS recipients also qualify for a food allowance and some can get medical benefits ...I think it depends on if they have insurance.

I'm just wondering, besides SS and AFDC being tax-funded, what's the difference between those programs and the BIP?
 
I'm just wondering, besides SS and AFDC being tax-funded, what's the difference between those programs and the BIP?
I am just taking a wild guess but perhaps the city was more aggressive in letting those in need of the program offered ? I think that many homeless are so distraught that they are not aware that help might be available to them.
 
I am just taking a wild guess but perhaps the city was more aggressive in letting those in need of the program offered ? I think that many homeless are so distraught that they are not aware that help might be available to them.
Yes, the recipients were chosen for this trial, so that's another difference (probly a temporary one), but if there are any significant differences. i.e., in the way the program is run or how it's managed or what additional benefits it offers, I'd like to know what those differences are. They might highlight ways that SS and AFDC could improve.
 
There is an assumption that if you are low income you can receive welfare. Most states cap the lifetime limit for most adults. If you are curious about your own state…look up that states rules. Many many people think there is no limit. That is simply not true.
 
This topic area is actually under active discussion today. Sadly it has for the most part been pushed into dark corners where it has to be discussed in terms of fiction:

 
I think all homeless have an image of being mentally ill, shiftless, dangerous, and alcoholic druggies.

I agree - but sadly such people just aren't paying attention. Perhaps such a statement was once true, but not today. People are working full-time jobs and can't afford a home. Outlook is bleak. The economy has changed. The dynamics on spending has changed, such as the incredible increase in housing costs against other things. The entire system has adjusted, and some are getting caught out. If we don't try to stem the tide now, how bad will it get?

As you state, I'm not sure if people are truly aware of the numbers. Around 22% of all Americans have less than $5000 in savings. That's 74m people.

A lot more are one serious medical bill from bankruptcy.
 
It hasn’t been AFDC since 1996 when it became TANF. Twelve month lifetime limit in Arizona. I believe unemployment maximum is one of the lowest in the nation as well.
 
I probably see more homeless each day than the average person since they camp in the park next to the bike path. These are the hardcore homeless. The worst off of these are out of their minds with schizophrenia. Those folks don’t even bother with a tent and sleep under a bridge. They usually only have a wool blanket to their name and scream word salad and obscenities at invisible enemies. I don’t know how they stay alive.

The oddest thing I have seen lately is what they call the “fentanyl fold”. Completely bent over but still standing and conscious. Eventually some get stuck in that position. Awful. Last week on three separate occasions I saw people smoking off tin foil (next to CVS, at a bus stop, and right next to the bike path - I held my breath!).

I don’t have any answers. Just relating what I observe. But as to the topic, I don’t know how much basic income would help the homeless at that hardcore level. Perhaps they would shoplift less at the Circle K and steal fewer bikes? Panhandle less on the medians? I DO think it would really help the portion of homeless who are still trying. Those in shelters, couch surfing, living in cars, etc. It might be the lift they need to improve their situation.
 
What we need is a modern day Robin Hood task force. Mission : Ask politely for donations from the very wealthy, especially in the form of "adopt a poor homeless person" and sponsor them for 5 years. To the regular wealthy, a sponsorship of 1 year. That is anyone body making $500.000 or more.

cvee.JPG
 
What a great story! We were in Denver recently and it is a beautiful city. It isn't even in the Top 10 in homelessness around the country but they still found something to help improve their situation. Other major cities might want to look to them as an example.

Cities with the largest homeless populations in 2023​

Among 49 major-city Continuums of Care
A table of the top major US cities by homeless population
Table with 2 columns and 10 rows.
CityHomeless population 2023
1New York City88,025
2Los Angeles City & County71,320
3Seattle/King County14,149
4San Diego City and County10,264
5Metropolitan Denver10,054
6San Jose/Santa Clara City & County9,903
7Oakland, Berkeley/Alameda County9,759
8Phoenix, Mesa/Maricopa County9,642
9Sacramento City & County9,281
10San Francisco7,582
Sorry, I just realized that I totally overlooked the fact that Metropolitan Denver is #5 in the country. It is the only city that starts with "metropolitan". 🤷‍♂️
 
Last edited:
Mission : Ask politely for donations from the very wealthy, ... That is anyone .. making $500.000 or more.

There is on YouTube a video of Warren Buffett where he talks about calling other Billionaires to try to get them to commit to give money to charity and that some of them told him they couldn't afford to give. He joked that he should write a self-help book for other Billionaires about 'How to live on 500 Million a Year'.
 
There is an assumption that if you are low income you can receive welfare. Most states cap the lifetime limit for most adults. If you are curious about your own state…look up that states rules. Many many people think there is no limit. That is simply not true.
Right. If you have NO income, you can receive welfare. In Calif, anyway.

In Calif, if you are employable, have no dependents, have exhausted all other benefits such as unemployment, your assets don't exceed $1500 (or something) and you are not a dependent of your parents, you can get partial benefits, and you are expected to seek employment. If you have dependents, are over 65, or are disabled/unemployable, you can get all the benefits.
 
I've been a big proponent of basic income since 2018. The people who were against it then, possibly because they thought that AI wasn't going to affect them, might be the very people who would be affected by AI. Maybe they're changing their tune.

Some of the arguments against it are just cruelty in poor disguise.

I hope there are more basic income programs being rolled out.
 
Am I the only one who feels that programs hyped as homelessness solutions are more enabling than repairing? I'll go one step further to say that the issue is more prevalent by degree in those areas that claim to be progressive. Come on, once again the vast majority of those who are homeless demonstrates the result of their own bad choices, not all, but the majority.
 
I'm conservative on almost everything except social services. Worked as a clerk a few years in state social services Some people through no fault of their own, fall through the cracks and can't pull themselves up by their bootstraps. Although everyone who is capable of working should, unless they have young kids at home.
 


Back
Top