Hannibal Lecter. Oh wait, was that a choice?![]()

Hannibal Lecter. Oh wait, was that a choice?![]()
He is completely irrelevant because he isn't on the list. Please try to stay on topic.I was thinking Patton
He is not on the list and is consequently irrelevant to the question..Myself... I'll take General Douglas MacArthur
"Whoever said the pen is mightier than
the sword obviously has never encountered
automatic weapons"
Thanks for not trying to derail the thread by going off topic.I am impressed by Alexander the Great’s military achievements and strategic genius. He conquered a vast portion of the known world, creating one of the largest empires in history, in just 13 years. His tactics, such as the use of phalanx formations and lightning-fast marches, were innovative and effective. He also demonstrated exceptional leadership skills, inspiring loyalty and devotion in his troops.
Alexander’s ability to adapt to different environments and enemies, from the Persian Empire’s massive armies to the Indian and Bactrian kingdoms, is impressive. His willingness to experiment and innovate, as seen in his use of elephants and other unconventional tactics, showcases his creative genius.
While Hannibal and Julius Caesar were both skilled generals, Alexander’s sheer scope of conquests and strategic brilliance set him apart. Hannibal’s achievements in Italy were remarkable, but his campaigns were largely limited to a specific region and timeframe. Julius Caesar’s military successes were significant, but he often relied on his political influence and logistical advantages to achieve victory.
Alexander the Great’s impressive record of conquests, innovative tactics, and exceptional leadership make him the general who impresses me most among the three.
There is a comedy or humor section specifically provided to make jokes.
Thanks for staying on topic.Precisely that. if he'd had the support of his people.. he would have been unstoppable , I believe !
Doesn't really matter. It's not like there is a prize for picking the right answer.There are three choices. What is the point of bringing in hundreds of other choices? Hmmmm?
Wow, got your PM, please do report and put me on ignore if you don't have any sense of humor.
What you don't seem to understand is that we don't actually own the threads we start. We are not in control of the thoughts of others. This a discussion forum, not a pop quiz on any particular subject.BTW There is a humor section in which to crack jokes provided here. Also, one can post one's own thread involving whatever subject one is interesting in. In short, there is neither necessity nor justification to be constantly attempting to derail another member's threads via posting irrelevant content nor via posting inane off-topic jokes..
Could be wrong but it looks like to me you are wound a little tight......take a deep breath and Chill !BTW There is a humor section in which to crack jokes provided here. Also, one can post one's own thread involving whatever subject one is interesting in. In short, there is neither necessity nor justification to be constantly attempting to derail another member's threads via posting irrelevant content nor via posting inane off-topic jokes..
Could be wrong but it looks like to me you are wound a little tight......take a deep breath and Chill !
Oh, I'm more than willing to share my Caesar salad dressing with you or anyone else.
Have a lovely evening and....
View attachment 367968
View attachment 367970
Very relevant comment! Thanks for the feedback! I totally agree that these generals were not good people and definitely didn't have God's blessings. However, I choose not to imagine them being roasted alive forever as punishment since that roasting alive would make God seem like a criminally insane sadist unworthy of being worshipped. In fact, to me, he would seem more immoral than the generals that he is roasting alive. IMHO.Basically Murderers. Now in Hell!
It happens from time to time but the earth goes spinning on its axis regardless. One of the questions I have learned to ask myself at such times is, "How much will this matter in a hundred years?"Notice how lightening up demands the acceptance of a malicious derailment of the thread.
What you don't seem to understand is that we don't actually own the threads we start. We are not in control of the thoughts of others. This a discussion forum, not a pop quiz on any particular subject.
Then why were you reprimanding me for going off topic in the Ear Piercing thread and claiming that your patience was coming to an end?It happens from time to time but the earth goes spinning on its axis regardless. One of the questions I have learned to ask myself at such times is, "How much will this matter in a hundred years?"
If the answer is, "Not one jot", then I let it pass through to the keeper.
This helps me maintain my equilibrium and it is a good way to avoid high blood pressure.![]()
Did I do that? Please accept my apology.Then why were you reprimanding me for going off topic in the Ear Piercing thread and claiming that your patience was coming to an end?
Isn't rather self contradictory
No problem my friend.Did I do that? Please accept my apology.
That wasn't the opinion you had a few days ago.Doesn't really matter. It's not like there is a prize for picking the right answer.
Tough choice. I think I'll go with Hannibal for crossing The Alps with elephants.
I'd be grateful if you could explain how I went off topic.Thanks for trying to stay on-topic.
You were perfectly on topic. Sorry if I unintentionally gave the impression that you were not. Thanks for the relevant participation.I'd be grateful if you could explain how I went off topic.