'We' live our life (lives) contrary to the law of nature.
Hmmm?
Absolutely.I think that is a true statement. We strengthen the weak, and we weaken the strong in a ridiculous effort to equalize, to neutralize, but Mother Nature has no sense of justice --only of the cold march of progress.
Absolutely. My family nicknamed me "Mother Nature". I don't cry at funerals, and they think I am cold and unemotional. Quite the contrary: I just inside me know death or whatever is supposed to happen, we humans have no real control; just feels "normal" to me...crying isn't going to fix someone being dead. I cry more out of human frustration or anger than "sorrow" about death itself.
If you think of this in terms of acids and bases, Mother Nature absolutely supports neutralization.We strengthen the weak, and we weaken the strong in a ridiculous effort to equalize, to neutralize, but Mother Nature has no sense of justice
Yes, but I meant 'neutalize' figurativelyIf you think of this in terms of acids and bases, Mother Nature absolutely supports neutralization.
Too late. Not for the earth of course, but too late for the earth as we know and love it.The best thing that could happen to the Earth would be the extinction of the human race.
Too late. Not for the earth of course, but too late for the earth as we know and love it.
Humans always have to mess with things trying to make them better and usually make things worse.
I was having this discussion with a former meal client a few years ago. I was saying, "Imagine what a paradise the Earth would be if there were no humans. Everything would be in balance."
Perhaps:'We' live our life (lives) contrary to the law of nature.
I don't believe we can validate or invalidate that statement until we can agree on the definition of nature and who or what is the author of its laws.
This looks like an interesting read,I dunno.
I think that if humans were to disappear for whatever (non nuclear) reason, after a hundred thousand years or so, all traces of our "civilization" would have disappeared and to a casual observer, there would be no signs that we were ever here.
Some species we've driven to extinction might not return, but eventually some new ones might begin to evolve.
That's moving from science to society.I was thinking the WHOLE time covid was "untamed": "Boy is THIS Mother Nature helping humanity out or what?"
Trying to SAVE 90 year olds in nursing homes? Save people with autoimmune systems that are non functional, or over functional, save asthmatics, save extremely FAT 500lb people who are obviously going to die early and horribly anyway?
What the H for??
SO they can survive?
Survive just to die?
If that isn't "contrary" to Nature I do not know what is.
How so? Humans are supposed to evolve and gain immunity through trial and error, as happens in all of life.That's moving from science to society.
Medicine is science. Deciding what to do with it is society.How so? Humans are supposed to evolve and gain immunity through trial and error, as happens in all of life.
I've seen one called "After Humans". I think it was on The History ChannelThis looks like an interesting read,
The World Without Us
By: Alan Weisman
https://www.bartleby.com/essay/The-World-Without-Us-F3CTGQ3JTC
There also have been numerous programs on the internet about THE WORLD WITHOUT PEOPLE.