I have shunned sugary foods, and use of sugar when possible, for years, my concern always being for my teeth. So here's another "Impful" imponderable: Brand name Splenda, chemically Sucralose, packaged in yellow packets, is labeled, in this order: Dextrose, Maltodextrin, Sucralose. Calories 0. Dextrose is plain old table sugar, same as Glucose, or Grape Sugar. Maltodextrin is a type of Dextrose in linked chain form:
"Maltodextrin is used as an inexpensive additive to thicken food products such as infant formula. It is also used as a filler in sugar substitutes and other products.[SUP][5][/SUP]
Maltodextrin has a glycemic index ranging from 85 to 105." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maltodextrin#As_food_ingredient
So, it's also sugar! How "strong"? Dextrose Glycemic index = 100. The final ingredient, Sucralose, is non-nutritive. Thus, I see the bulk of this stuff as adding to my tooth decay! In this particular example, they have carefully avoided use of the term, "Sugar-free".
This is "truthful labeling"? imp

"Maltodextrin is used as an inexpensive additive to thicken food products such as infant formula. It is also used as a filler in sugar substitutes and other products.[SUP][5][/SUP]
Maltodextrin has a glycemic index ranging from 85 to 105." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maltodextrin#As_food_ingredient
So, it's also sugar! How "strong"? Dextrose Glycemic index = 100. The final ingredient, Sucralose, is non-nutritive. Thus, I see the bulk of this stuff as adding to my tooth decay! In this particular example, they have carefully avoided use of the term, "Sugar-free".
This is "truthful labeling"? imp
