Americans Traveling To Europe Will Be Fingerprinted

Not necessarily. US citizen is not the same as US government. US citizens enjoy thinking critically and are still permitted to do so. And not all US citizens object. Opinions vary.
Of course.

But nobody seems to be complaining about visitors to US being fingerprinted - just to other countries requiring it of them.
 

so US finger prints people visiting US but US citizens object to being finger printed when they visit other countries?

Well, speaking as a native San Franciscan, we’ve had our share of trouble with Australians in the past, so yeah, we want your fingerprints when you arrive. All we ask is that you wipe the Vegemite off your fingers first. We don’t want to jam the scanner. 😄aahahahahahahahaa!
 
But nobody seems to be complaining about visitors to US being fingerprinted


Probably because folks from other countries are used to doing whatever they're told, no questions asked. Americans, on the other hand, have a long-standing cultural resistance to government overreach and value personal freedom and privacy, even if that sometimes makes them seem uncooperative abroad.
 
What I meant was that Americans aren't complaining about other people having to do it to enter US - only about themselves having to do the same elsewhere.
if it is neccesary one way, it is neccesary both ways.

not that the folks from other countries aren't complaining.
 
What I meant was that Americans aren't complaining about other people having to do it to enter US - only about themselves having to do the same elsewhere. if it is neccesary one way, it is neccesary both ways. not that the folks from other countries aren't complaining.

I seriously doubt the average American even knows that foreign visitors are fingerprinted when entering the U.S. So it’s a stretch to say Americans are fine with others being fingerprinted but object when the same is required of them elsewhere. Most Americans probably haven’t thought about it either way.
 
Probably because folks from other countries are used to doing whatever they're told, no questions asked. Americans, on the other hand, have a long-standing cultural resistance to government overreach and value personal freedom and privacy, even if that sometimes makes them seem uncooperative abroad.
We should not be uncooperative abroad. We should remember that we are guests in a country not our own and behave respectfully.
Anyway, it's not as if Americans don't have a choice. We can stay home.
 
Last edited:
We should not be uncooperative abroad. We should remember that we are guests in a country not our own and behave respectfully. Anyway, it's not as if Americans don't have a choice. We can stay home.

You're absolutely right that we should be respectful when visiting other countries, and I agree. After all, acting like an entitled guest helps no one. But let’s not confuse healthy skepticism of authority with disrespect. There’s a clear difference between blind compliance and polite cooperation. I live in Thailand and follow the rules; I file my 90-day reports with immigration and renew my visa every year as required. But if the government here were to impose what I consider unreasonable restrictions, I wouldn’t argue or protest, I’d simply pack up and go elsewhere.
 
I seriously doubt the average American even knows that foreign visitors are fingerprinted when entering the U.S. So it’s a stretch to say Americans are fine with others being fingerprinted but object when the same is required of them elsewhere. Most Americans probably haven’t thought about it either way.

I suppose it’s the people with strong opinions who get heard the most, and then others assume that must be the mainstream view. Meanwhile, the people who couldn’t care less either way -- possibly the true majority, the real mainstream -- don’t get heard at all. People then get the wrong impression of the thoughts of a group or nation of people. Grouping everyone together with the opinions of the most vocal.
 
Last edited:
I suppose it’s the people with strong opinions who get heard the most, and then others assume that must be the mainstream view. Meanwhile, the people who couldn’t care less either way -- possibly the true majority, the real mainstream -- don’t get heard at all. People then get the wrong impression of the thoughts of a group or nation of people. Grouping everyone together with the opinions of the most vocal.


yes that's true - probably the vast majority couldn't care either way and are Ok with being fingerprinted as they go elsewhere along with people being fingerprinted to come to their country

It did strike me that . before being vocal complaining about other countries doing it to them, people should check and realise it is the same both ways though
and then either accept it works both ways or complain about both ways - not selectively complain about other countries.
 
I seriously doubt the average American even knows that foreign visitors are fingerprinted when entering the U.S. So it’s a stretch to say Americans are fine with others being fingerprinted but object when the same is required of them elsewhere. Most Americans probably haven’t thought about it either way.
Exactly Oslookar!! I don't travel abroad, so I didn't know about that and surely I'm not alone. @January
 
I went to Thailand last year (Bangkok) and they fingerprint every non-national entering the country. All fingers and thumbs, both hands.

Yes, Thailand does fingerprint all foreign visitors. It’s become standard procedure here. Unfortunately, the country has had its share of problems with foreign fugitives trying to hide out, and overstayers who remain longer than they are supposed to. So immigration has tightened things up in recent years and I can't say that I blame them.
 
Retina scan...
Immigration officials could focus a little more on the bad actors rather than the other 99%.
When the leader of a country says 'Death to Americans' maybe we should politely decline the applications of most citizens from that country.
Then maybe those citizens would look askance at their leader. Maybe he'd be replaced.
Also, I don't see why anyone needs to be a citizen of two countries. But I know the practice is well established so maybe I'm wrong. I'm often wrong. If so, please enlighten me.
 


Back
Top